Talk:Lebensraum

Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient)

1. Relevance: 7/10: The relevance of the concept 'Lebensraum' for this course is clear. Lebensraum is an concept that gives an explanation for the use of space by humans. In this case the expansion drive of people and such theories/concepts fits within the work field of spatial action. 

2. Well-written: 7/10: The page is well-written, the writer used correct English and had a professional standard. 

3. Well-researched: 7/10: The page is well-researched, the contributors used two scientific well-written references for the text. Besides they used the APA guidelines correctly in the text to relate certain parts to the source. One comment as regards to the references is that in the text they refer to (Werlen, personal communication) but under the heading 'references' they do not come back at this. 

4. Broad in its coverage: 8/10: The page addresses the main aspects of the topic. There is attention for the main aspects and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. 

5. Neutral: 9/10: The text is written neutral. There is no criticizing performed by the authors. 

6. Stable: 9/10: During the time there were no massive changes on this page. 

7. Well-structured: 6/10: The page is well structured. The choose to set the whole text in one section, and make no sections. In principle this is also not necessary, but I think the text get more structured when the different uses/developments of the concept Lebensraum are presented separate (different use layout and putting together the different 'subjects'). 

8. Illustrated: 10/10: Inapplicable: for this concept there are no illustrations that will improve this page.  

9. Length: 8/10: The length of the page is good, it is not a bulky concept, so it isn't necessary to write a large piece of text. 


----

Page evaluated by Lars Paardekooper --[[User:LarsPaardekooper|LarsPaardekooper]] 15:02, 23 October 2012 (CEST)