Talk:Life world

Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient) 

1. Relevance: 9: The relevance of this page for the course spatial action is high. Life world is used in the concept of phenomenology, and that's an important concept in the context of spatial action because there is critique about our subjective perspective. 

2. Well-written: 8: The page is mostly well-written, the writers have used correct English. Further there is used a basic standard, but it seems OK. 

3. well-researched: 7: The research is done OK. The application of the APA guidlines is complete and verifiable. But in the end they are making a conclusion with a reference, but in conclusion it's better to make only a conclusion, without a reference. References should be used in paragraphs before the conclusion. 


4. Broad in its coverage: 9: the page adresses the main aspects of this topic. But in the second paragraph they are starting a new main aspect: about the meaning of life world in geography. There can be used a new heading. 

5. Neutral: 9: The text is written neutral. There is no criticizing performed by the authors.
 
6. Stable: 7: The page is stable, and in total only enhanced by two people. 
 
7. Well-structured: 8: There are two headings which are good, but there can be one more heading added: ''life world in geography". Because first they explain the concept of life word and it's origin, but then they are making a linkages to geography. 
 
8. Illustrated: -: There is no illustration. 
 
9. Length: 9: The length of the page is good, it stays to the point, which makes it easy to read.