Talk:Franz Kafka

Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient)
1. Relevance: It is relevant for this course.
Rating: 8(0-10)
Comments: yes, I believe it is important to give a podium to the people that have given subjects in Human Geography any thought through the ages.
2. Well-written:
a) well-written: its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard; the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct;
Rating: 8(0-10)
Comments: yes
b) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context.
Rating: 6 (0-10)
Comments: yes, It would be a shame if one would say that all is said about this man in a couple of sentences. Ofcourse there is a lot more to say or write.
3. well-researched: Factually accurate and verifiable:
a) it provides references to all sources of information following the APA guidelines;
Rating: 0(0-10)
Comments: No sources needed
b) it provides in-line citations (including page numbers) from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the APA guidelines.
Rating: 0 (0-10)
Comments: not needed
4. Broad in its coverage:
a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;
Rating: 7 (0-10)
Comments: yes, but detail can be given…
b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
Rating: 8(0-10)
Comments: yes
5. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
Rating: 7(0-10)
Comments: slightly
6. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Rating: 8(0-10)
Comments: no
7. Well-structured:
a) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
Rating: 8(0-10)
Comments: yes
b) appropriate structure: a system of hierarchical section headings and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents.
Rating: 4(0-10)
Comments: no, but not needed at this stage
c) categories: is the entry categorized in a correct way? (Which categories are missing?)
Rating: 0(0-10)
Comments: caterogies are still missing
8. Illustrated: if possible, by images, maps, schematic overviews:
a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
Rating: 8(0-10)
Comments: yes, protrait of himself
b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Rating: 8(0-10)
Comments: yes
9. Length: It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style.
Rating: 6(0-10)
Comments: more information about this man can definatly be given