Autonomy of social(sub) systems
From Geography
(New page: under construction by s4094913) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | + | “Psychic and social systems, unlike machines and organisms, can be characterized by their use of meaning”(Luhmann, 1995, p. 3), they cannot exist without organisms and other material systems. At this level of analysis each type of system is autonomous. An organism is not a part of a psychic system, and a social system does not consist of psychic systems. Because these kinds of systems are perationally closed, they exist only as environments for each other. As a result of Luhmann’s specific sociological concerns, social systems are differentiated into interactions, organisations and societies. | |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | By Mike van der Linden and Paul Cuijpers | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Gren, M & Zierhofer, W. (2003) Environment and planning Pion publication Great Britain | ||
| + | |||
| + | Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems Standford university press Standford | ||
Revision as of 08:38, 18 November 2010
“Psychic and social systems, unlike machines and organisms, can be characterized by their use of meaning”(Luhmann, 1995, p. 3), they cannot exist without organisms and other material systems. At this level of analysis each type of system is autonomous. An organism is not a part of a psychic system, and a social system does not consist of psychic systems. Because these kinds of systems are perationally closed, they exist only as environments for each other. As a result of Luhmann’s specific sociological concerns, social systems are differentiated into interactions, organisations and societies.
By Mike van der Linden and Paul Cuijpers
Gren, M & Zierhofer, W. (2003) Environment and planning Pion publication Great Britain
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems Standford university press Standford
