Discursive Formation
From Geography
JesperRemmen (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ''' | + | Michel Foucault represented the [[discursive approach]]. This approach is the opposite of the [[semiotic approach]]. The semiotic approach saw language as the [[representation]] instead of the discursive approach, which saw discource as the representation. The movement from the semiotic approach to the discursive approach was the movement from the analysis based on 'the domain of signifying structure' to an analysis based on 'relations of force, strategic developments and tactics'. (Hall, 1997) |
| - | Michel Foucault | + | The meaning of discourse, by [[Michel Foucault]], is the production of knowledge by organizing statements. He quotes: 'Here I believe one's point of references should not be to the great model of language and signs, but to that of war and battle' (Foucault, 1980) Not language, but discourse was studied as a system of representation. Although the discursive approach is also about language as a way of production of knowledge and language is a link to the practice. |
| - | + | Therefore the representation of the knowledge of a particular object is based on words, sentences and signs, but on views from different authors, in different texes, and so on, rooted in the society and social life. This stands for [[discourse]], which defines and produces the objects of knowledge. The representation of the truth claims are strongly depended to the period of time the statement has been made.(Hall, 1997) | |
| - | + | There is a ''[[discursive formation]]'' when the representation of the knowledge about the same object, the meaning of the statements, has a heterogeneous nature, have the same coherence and systematicity, occurs in common institutions and is implicated materially in the conduct of social life. (Johnston, Gregory, Pratt, Watts, 2000) | |
| - | + | ==Example== | |
| + | Foucault is saying that [[discourse]] never consist of one statement, one text, one action or one source. When different discursive events refer to the same object they belong to the same discursive formation. | ||
| + | For example an divorce-case in court. In this [[discourse]] there are two sides. With both different arguments, actions, opinions and goals. Both sides participate in this discourse in a specific pattern and although their goals and actions are different, they both refer to the same object. | ||
| - | |||
| - | + | ---- | |
| - | + | '''References:''' | |
| - | + | Foucalt, M., ''Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977'', edited by Colin Gordon ( Harvester, London 1980) | |
| + | |||
| + | Hall, S., ''Cultural Representations And Signifying Practices'' (Sage, Londen 1997) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Johnston, R.J., Gregory, D., Pratt, G. Watts, M., ''The dictionary of Human Geography'' ( Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 4th edition 2000) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Contributors== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Published by Meryl Burger (s0801704) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Example edited by Jesper Remmen--[[User:JesperRemmen|JesperRemmen]] 20:27, 21 October 2012 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:27, 21 October 2012
Michel Foucault represented the discursive approach. This approach is the opposite of the semiotic approach. The semiotic approach saw language as the representation instead of the discursive approach, which saw discource as the representation. The movement from the semiotic approach to the discursive approach was the movement from the analysis based on 'the domain of signifying structure' to an analysis based on 'relations of force, strategic developments and tactics'. (Hall, 1997)
The meaning of discourse, by Michel Foucault, is the production of knowledge by organizing statements. He quotes: 'Here I believe one's point of references should not be to the great model of language and signs, but to that of war and battle' (Foucault, 1980) Not language, but discourse was studied as a system of representation. Although the discursive approach is also about language as a way of production of knowledge and language is a link to the practice.
Therefore the representation of the knowledge of a particular object is based on words, sentences and signs, but on views from different authors, in different texes, and so on, rooted in the society and social life. This stands for discourse, which defines and produces the objects of knowledge. The representation of the truth claims are strongly depended to the period of time the statement has been made.(Hall, 1997)
There is a discursive formation when the representation of the knowledge about the same object, the meaning of the statements, has a heterogeneous nature, have the same coherence and systematicity, occurs in common institutions and is implicated materially in the conduct of social life. (Johnston, Gregory, Pratt, Watts, 2000)
Example
Foucault is saying that discourse never consist of one statement, one text, one action or one source. When different discursive events refer to the same object they belong to the same discursive formation. For example an divorce-case in court. In this discourse there are two sides. With both different arguments, actions, opinions and goals. Both sides participate in this discourse in a specific pattern and although their goals and actions are different, they both refer to the same object.
References:
Foucalt, M., Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, edited by Colin Gordon ( Harvester, London 1980)
Hall, S., Cultural Representations And Signifying Practices (Sage, Londen 1997)
Johnston, R.J., Gregory, D., Pratt, G. Watts, M., The dictionary of Human Geography ( Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 4th edition 2000)
Contributors
Published by Meryl Burger (s0801704)
Example edited by Jesper Remmen--JesperRemmen 20:27, 21 October 2012 (CEST)
