Talk:Edmund Husserl
From Geography
(Created page with "1. Relevance: 7/10: The page by Edmund Husserl is relevant for this course. Husserl is the father of the phenomenology, an important concept in the classical action theories. ...") |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | 1. Relevance: 7/10: The page by Edmund Husserl is relevant for this course. Husserl is the father of the phenomenology, an important concept in the classical action theories. | + | 1. Relevance: 7/10: The page by Edmund Husserl is relevant for this course. Husserl is the founding father of the phenomenology, an important concept in the classical action theories. |
| - | 2. Well-written: 5/10: The written style of the page is not completely sufficient, there are spelling | + | 2. Well-written: 5/10: The written style of the page is not completely sufficient, there are spelling errors and some of the sentences runs rough. Besides the writing-style, it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context |
| - | 3. | + | 3. Well-researched: 5-6/10: For this page there are different sources used, the only problem with this is that the contributors used Wikipedia as source, which is not a scientific source. The APA guidelines in the text are used correctly. |
4. Broad in its coverage: 7/10: The page addresses the main aspects of the person Edmund Husserl. There is attention for the main aspects (that are also relevant for this course) such as: background information, his contributions for the science and important works. Besides it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. | 4. Broad in its coverage: 7/10: The page addresses the main aspects of the person Edmund Husserl. There is attention for the main aspects (that are also relevant for this course) such as: background information, his contributions for the science and important works. Besides it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
9. Length: 7/10: The length of the page is okay, through keeping the text summarily it becomes interesting to read, but the part of the contributions and approach of Yi-Fu Tuan could maybe more extensive, with more explaining of his contributions, to for example the concept of place and space, the page would improve. | 9. Length: 7/10: The length of the page is okay, through keeping the text summarily it becomes interesting to read, but the part of the contributions and approach of Yi-Fu Tuan could maybe more extensive, with more explaining of his contributions, to for example the concept of place and space, the page would improve. | ||
| - | Page evaluated by Lars Paardekooper --[[User:LarsPaardekooper|LarsPaardekooper]] 14:19, 23 October 2012 (CEST) 23 October 2012 | + | |
| + | |||
| + | == Contributors == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * ''Page evaluated by Lars Paardekooper --[[User:LarsPaardekooper|LarsPaardekooper]] 14:19, 23 October 2012 (CEST) 23 October 2012'' | ||
Latest revision as of 13:38, 23 October 2012
1. Relevance: 7/10: The page by Edmund Husserl is relevant for this course. Husserl is the founding father of the phenomenology, an important concept in the classical action theories.
2. Well-written: 5/10: The written style of the page is not completely sufficient, there are spelling errors and some of the sentences runs rough. Besides the writing-style, it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context
3. Well-researched: 5-6/10: For this page there are different sources used, the only problem with this is that the contributors used Wikipedia as source, which is not a scientific source. The APA guidelines in the text are used correctly.
4. Broad in its coverage: 7/10: The page addresses the main aspects of the person Edmund Husserl. There is attention for the main aspects (that are also relevant for this course) such as: background information, his contributions for the science and important works. Besides it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
5. Neutral: 8/10: The text is written neutral. There is no criticizing performed by the authors.
6. Stable: 7/10: The page is pretty stable, the page is over time enhanced by two people, who did not change the page significantly.
7. Well-structured: 4/10: The structure of the page is bad. There are no clear headlines and sections between the different topics. The page is however included in a category.
8. Illustrated: 6/10: There are no pictures on this page, maybe a picture or photo of the person in question would contribute something to the page.
9. Length: 7/10: The length of the page is okay, through keeping the text summarily it becomes interesting to read, but the part of the contributions and approach of Yi-Fu Tuan could maybe more extensive, with more explaining of his contributions, to for example the concept of place and space, the page would improve.
Contributors
- Page evaluated by Lars Paardekooper --LarsPaardekooper 14:19, 23 October 2012 (CEST) 23 October 2012
