Spatial science
From Geography
| (One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Eventually, spatial science took human attributes of human decision-making seriously, which lead to towards a form of [[behavioural location theory]] (Cloke, P., Philo, C. & Sadler, D., 1991, p.66-67). | Eventually, spatial science took human attributes of human decision-making seriously, which lead to towards a form of [[behavioural location theory]] (Cloke, P., Philo, C. & Sadler, D., 1991, p.66-67). | ||
| + | === Critique === | ||
| + | During the 1960s many geographers embraced a behavioural perspective ( [[Behavioural Geography]] ) in spatial science, because in that time science as a whole was failing to solve and notice human problems (James Blaut, 1984, p.150). But some geographers felt is was necessary to extend that behavioural critique of spatial science into a much more effective critique. In short, a number of geographers set in train a whole new chapter in geographical thought, a chapter in which the positivistic cast of spatial science was explicitly identified and was explicitly criticised through an appeal to an alternative package of humanist philosophies - notably [[Phenomenology]] and [[Existentialism]] - that carried with them an anti-positivist vision of appropriate questions to ask about human beings and of appropriate research procedures to employ in the process (Cloke, Philo & Sadler, 1991, p. 69). | ||
| + | This whole new chapter, known as [[Humanistic geography]], began establishing itself during the late 1960s as a commanding source of philosophical critique of spatial science. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | === '''References:''' === | ||
Cloke, P., Philo, C. & Sadler, D. (1991). Approaching Human Geography: An Introduction to Contemporary and Theoretical Debates. New York: Guilfort Press. | Cloke, P., Philo, C. & Sadler, D. (1991). Approaching Human Geography: An Introduction to Contemporary and Theoretical Debates. New York: Guilfort Press. | ||
Edited by Malou van Woerkum & Robert Wursten | Edited by Malou van Woerkum & Robert Wursten | ||
| + | |||
| + | page enhanced by Niek van Enckevort --[[NiekVanEnckevort|NiekVanEnckevort]] 16:20, 23 October 2012 | ||
Latest revision as of 15:03, 23 October 2012
Spatial Science is an approach in the human geography, starting in the 1950’s. Geographers in North America and Britain were convinced that geography could be treated as any other science. Their aim was to specify the laws of spatial organization, by looking at the spatial patterns in landscapes and the human activity in these landscapes.
With the use of gravity models equivalent to Newtons ‘laws of gravitational attraction’, spatial scientists tried to explain and predict patterns of human interaction (migration flows, traffic flows, information flows) between settlements of different sizes and distances from one another (Cloke, P., Philo, C. & Sadler, D.,1991, p.66).
But critical notes came up, even from within the spatial scientist circle. Unease quickly emerged about the fact that ‘laws’ and ‘models’, that were made by spatial scientist, could never completely correspond to situations in real life. To overcome the discrepancy between reality and theory, some of them said it was needed to take a more probabilistic or stochastic approach. In this way, they reckoned that chance or random factors play a significant role in ‘distorting’ ideal patterns of interaction.
There is also another way to overcome the discrepancy between reality and theory. According to other spatial scientists the only solution was to design some sort of model which engaged the thoughts and actions of those people who did not act in the way you should expect by looking at older models.
Eventually, spatial science took human attributes of human decision-making seriously, which lead to towards a form of behavioural location theory (Cloke, P., Philo, C. & Sadler, D., 1991, p.66-67).
Critique
During the 1960s many geographers embraced a behavioural perspective ( Behavioural Geography ) in spatial science, because in that time science as a whole was failing to solve and notice human problems (James Blaut, 1984, p.150). But some geographers felt is was necessary to extend that behavioural critique of spatial science into a much more effective critique. In short, a number of geographers set in train a whole new chapter in geographical thought, a chapter in which the positivistic cast of spatial science was explicitly identified and was explicitly criticised through an appeal to an alternative package of humanist philosophies - notably Phenomenology and Existentialism - that carried with them an anti-positivist vision of appropriate questions to ask about human beings and of appropriate research procedures to employ in the process (Cloke, Philo & Sadler, 1991, p. 69). This whole new chapter, known as Humanistic geography, began establishing itself during the late 1960s as a commanding source of philosophical critique of spatial science.
References:
Cloke, P., Philo, C. & Sadler, D. (1991). Approaching Human Geography: An Introduction to Contemporary and Theoretical Debates. New York: Guilfort Press.
Edited by Malou van Woerkum & Robert Wursten
page enhanced by Niek van Enckevort --NiekVanEnckevort 16:20, 23 October 2012
