Talk:Post-structuralism
From Geography
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "1. Relevance 10-10: The post-structuralism is one of the main topics of the Spatial Action course. Therefore it is very relevant. 2.") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | 1. Relevance 10-10 | + | 1. Relevance: 10-10 The post-structuralism is one of the main topics of the Spatial Action course. Therefore it is very relevant. |
| - | 2. | + | 2. a. Well Written: 8-10 Spelling and grammar are correct. |
| + | b. Comprehensive: 8-10 There is an appropriate use of jargon and the content is very clear through the use of sentences. | ||
| + | 3. a. Well researched: 7-10 The upper reference is not complete but the sources are diverse although not many are used. | ||
| + | b. in-line citations: 8-10 The inline citations are good. Some are quotes and some are taken over in the own words. | ||
| + | 4. a. Main Aspects: 9-10 All the important thinkers and theories are mentioned. | ||
| + | b. focused: 10-10 All the details are usefull | ||
| + | 5. a. Neutral: 10-10 There is no personal opninion in this text | ||
| + | 6. Stable: 10-10 No edit war found... | ||
| + | 7. a. Lead: 8-10 The lead is well written and gives an overview but is not really separated from the text | ||
| + | b. Structure: 6-10 The structure is quit clear, but there is no table of content and no hierarchical section. | ||
| + | c. | ||
Revision as of 08:48, 24 October 2012
1. Relevance: 10-10 The post-structuralism is one of the main topics of the Spatial Action course. Therefore it is very relevant. 2. a. Well Written: 8-10 Spelling and grammar are correct.
b. Comprehensive: 8-10 There is an appropriate use of jargon and the content is very clear through the use of sentences.
3. a. Well researched: 7-10 The upper reference is not complete but the sources are diverse although not many are used.
b. in-line citations: 8-10 The inline citations are good. Some are quotes and some are taken over in the own words.
4. a. Main Aspects: 9-10 All the important thinkers and theories are mentioned.
b. focused: 10-10 All the details are usefull
5. a. Neutral: 10-10 There is no personal opninion in this text 6. Stable: 10-10 No edit war found... 7. a. Lead: 8-10 The lead is well written and gives an overview but is not really separated from the text
b. Structure: 6-10 The structure is quit clear, but there is no table of content and no hierarchical section. c.
