Talk:Post-structuralism

From Geography

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
1. Relevance: 10-10 The post-structuralism is one of the main topics of the Spatial Action course. Therefore it is very relevant.
1. Relevance: 10-10 The post-structuralism is one of the main topics of the Spatial Action course. Therefore it is very relevant.
-
2. a. Well Written: 8-10 Spelling and grammar are correct.  
+
 
-
  b. Comprehensive: 8-10 There is an appropriate use of jargon and the content is very clear through the use of sentences.
+
 
-
3. a. Well researched: 7-10 The upper reference is not complete but the sources are diverse although not many are used.
+
2 a. Well Written: 8-10 Spelling and grammar are correct.  
-
  b. in-line citations: 8-10 The inline citations are good. Some are quotes and some are taken over in the own words.
+
 
-
4. a. Main Aspects: 9-10 All the important thinkers and theories are mentioned.  
+
2 b. Comprehensive: 8-10 There is an appropriate use of jargon and the content is very clear through the use of sentences.
-
  b. focused: 10-10 All the details are usefull
+
 
-
5. a. Neutral: 10-10 There is no personal opninion in this text
+
 
 +
3 a. Well researched: 7-10 The upper reference is not complete but the sources are diverse although not many are used.
 +
 
 +
3 b. in-line citations: 8-10 The inline citations are good. Some are quotes and some are taken over in the own words.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
4 a. Main Aspects: 9-10 All the important thinkers and theories are mentioned.  
 +
 
 +
4 b. focused: 10-10 All the details are useful.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
5 Neutral: 10-10 There is no personal opinion in this text.
 +
 
 +
 
6. Stable: 10-10 No edit war found...
6. Stable: 10-10 No edit war found...
-
7. a. Lead: 8-10 The lead is well written and gives an overview but is not really separated from the text
+
 
-
  b. Structure: 6-10 The structure is quit clear, but there is no table of content and no hierarchical section.
+
 
-
  c.
+
7.a. Lead: 8-10 The lead is well written and gives an overview but is not really separated from the text.
 +
 
 +
7 b. Structure: 6-10 The structure is quit clear, but there is no table of content and no hierarchical section.
 +
 
 +
7 c. Categories: 5-10 No categorization.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
8 a. Illustrated: No rating: It was not possible to put in pictures trough out the course.
 +
 
 +
8 b. Relevant: No rating...
 +
 
 +
9. Length: 9-10 Very well focused on the topic, could have a little more detail in it.

Latest revision as of 08:56, 24 October 2012

1. Relevance: 10-10 The post-structuralism is one of the main topics of the Spatial Action course. Therefore it is very relevant.


2 a. Well Written: 8-10 Spelling and grammar are correct.

2 b. Comprehensive: 8-10 There is an appropriate use of jargon and the content is very clear through the use of sentences.


3 a. Well researched: 7-10 The upper reference is not complete but the sources are diverse although not many are used.

3 b. in-line citations: 8-10 The inline citations are good. Some are quotes and some are taken over in the own words.


4 a. Main Aspects: 9-10 All the important thinkers and theories are mentioned.

4 b. focused: 10-10 All the details are useful.


5 Neutral: 10-10 There is no personal opinion in this text.


6. Stable: 10-10 No edit war found...


7.a. Lead: 8-10 The lead is well written and gives an overview but is not really separated from the text.

7 b. Structure: 6-10 The structure is quit clear, but there is no table of content and no hierarchical section.

7 c. Categories: 5-10 No categorization.


8 a. Illustrated: No rating: It was not possible to put in pictures trough out the course.

8 b. Relevant: No rating...

9. Length: 9-10 Very well focused on the topic, could have a little more detail in it.

Personal tools