Schütz's theory of man
From Geography
m |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | [[Alfred Schütz]] (1899-1959) was an Austrian social scientist who was inspired by the phenomenological philosophy of [[Edmund Husserl]] | + | [[Alfred Schütz]] (1899-1959) was an Austrian social scientist who was inspired by the phenomenological philosophy of [[Edmund Husserl]] (Springer, 1972, p. XVII). |
| - | Schütz | + | Schütz does not have a complete theory on human nature, but describes “the essence of human condition as the subjective experience of acting and adopting attitudes towards the everyday ‘lifeworld’ ” (Campbell, 1981, p.200). |
| - | In his theory of man, Schütz follows Husserl in his idea that people need to reflect on their own behavior (happened in the past) in order to understand their actions. Understanding behavior and attributing meaning to it, can only be obtained by judging your behavior in moments of reflection. | + | In his theory of man, Schütz follows Husserl in his idea that people need to reflect on their own behavior (experiences which happened in the past) in order to understand their actions. Understanding behavior and attributing meaning to it, can only be obtained by judging your behavior in moments of reflection. |
While reflecting, people select experiences out of their memory, which makes us see that our behavior is meaningful. | While reflecting, people select experiences out of their memory, which makes us see that our behavior is meaningful. | ||
| - | According to Schütz (Campbell, 1981, p.201) these memories are always | + | According to Schütz (Campbell, 1981, p.201) these memories are always split up in moments and times, while the everyday life experiences exists of a constant ‘flow’ of actions and experiences that merge into another. This makes Schütz believe that there are aspects in everyday life which cannot be grasped when we reflect on ourselves. But it’s in peoples nature to take certain things for granted, and to change others in the desired manner (Campbell, 1981, p.202). |
Schütz idea was that people experience their everyday life according to their own ‘stock of knowledge, which means that every individual acts or reacts according to his own history: what he learned or experienced in the past within his own society. Also our future actions therefore depends on our inherit [[stock of knowledge]]. Schütz emphasizes this strong relation between actions in the past, present and future (Campbell, 1981, p.204). | Schütz idea was that people experience their everyday life according to their own ‘stock of knowledge, which means that every individual acts or reacts according to his own history: what he learned or experienced in the past within his own society. Also our future actions therefore depends on our inherit [[stock of knowledge]]. Schütz emphasizes this strong relation between actions in the past, present and future (Campbell, 1981, p.204). | ||
Our stock of knowledge is in turn, organized by a collection of [[typifications]]: definitions we gave ‘things’ for example trees, chairs, dogs etc. which enables people to organize and recognize them in the everyday world (Campbell, 1981, p.203). | Our stock of knowledge is in turn, organized by a collection of [[typifications]]: definitions we gave ‘things’ for example trees, chairs, dogs etc. which enables people to organize and recognize them in the everyday world (Campbell, 1981, p.203). | ||
| - | The agent is because of his personal [[stock of knowledge]] able to act in a free way (see also [[free will]]). People can act intentionally and spontaneously. Schütz accepts that the fact that people may be influenced by social groups and societies and their place in the world. | + | The agent is because of his personal [[stock of knowledge]] able to act in a free way (see also [[free will]]). People can act intentionally and spontaneously. Schütz accepts that the fact that people may be influenced by social groups and societies and their place in the world as explained in [[Schütz's theory of society]]. |
On the other hand Schütz believes that experiences of people are given to them and that people can also act in a reflexive way (f.e. blushing) (Campbell, 1981, p.204). | On the other hand Schütz believes that experiences of people are given to them and that people can also act in a reflexive way (f.e. blushing) (Campbell, 1981, p.204). | ||
| - | + | According to Schutz, there are two kinds of facts. Facts that have to be taken for granted and facts that have to be selected out as relevant to the individual´s interests. Every individual sorts out his own world. This leads to a personal ´[[domain of relevance]]´. By sorting out his ´domain of interest´ a individual has typified his situation. He creates a personal situation with problems that must be solved. “A man is a problem-setting and a problem-solving animal” (Campbell, 1981, p. 202). The individual may set himself to alter his situation by action. He wants to change his real situation to an optimal situation. Schütz calls this rational activity. It is the motivated lived experience that represents the heart of the subjective awareness. | |
| - | - | + | The everyday- live is future-orientated. Schütz claims the expectations of the everyday world is expressed in the ‘[[in-order-to motive]]'. We do things in order to achieve an objective. We have fantasies of ‘having done’ things. We see a solved problem in our mind, and we want to make that situation reality. |
| - | + | ||
| + | |||
| + | == References == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Campbell, T. (1981). ''Seven theories of human society.'' Oxford University Press: Oxford | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Springer, J. (1972). ''The phenomenology of the social world.'' Northwestern University Press: Evanston | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Contributors == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * ''Page enhanced by --[[User:FabianBusch|FabianBusch]] - 17:58, 7 December 2011 (CET)'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * ''Link added by--[[User:DennisPrince|DennisPrince]] - 15:48, 16 September 2012 (CEST)'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * ''Page enhanced by Stef Tomesen - October 23rd 2012'' | ||
Latest revision as of 08:34, 25 October 2012
Alfred Schütz (1899-1959) was an Austrian social scientist who was inspired by the phenomenological philosophy of Edmund Husserl (Springer, 1972, p. XVII). Schütz does not have a complete theory on human nature, but describes “the essence of human condition as the subjective experience of acting and adopting attitudes towards the everyday ‘lifeworld’ ” (Campbell, 1981, p.200). In his theory of man, Schütz follows Husserl in his idea that people need to reflect on their own behavior (experiences which happened in the past) in order to understand their actions. Understanding behavior and attributing meaning to it, can only be obtained by judging your behavior in moments of reflection. While reflecting, people select experiences out of their memory, which makes us see that our behavior is meaningful.
According to Schütz (Campbell, 1981, p.201) these memories are always split up in moments and times, while the everyday life experiences exists of a constant ‘flow’ of actions and experiences that merge into another. This makes Schütz believe that there are aspects in everyday life which cannot be grasped when we reflect on ourselves. But it’s in peoples nature to take certain things for granted, and to change others in the desired manner (Campbell, 1981, p.202).
Schütz idea was that people experience their everyday life according to their own ‘stock of knowledge, which means that every individual acts or reacts according to his own history: what he learned or experienced in the past within his own society. Also our future actions therefore depends on our inherit stock of knowledge. Schütz emphasizes this strong relation between actions in the past, present and future (Campbell, 1981, p.204). Our stock of knowledge is in turn, organized by a collection of typifications: definitions we gave ‘things’ for example trees, chairs, dogs etc. which enables people to organize and recognize them in the everyday world (Campbell, 1981, p.203).
The agent is because of his personal stock of knowledge able to act in a free way (see also free will). People can act intentionally and spontaneously. Schütz accepts that the fact that people may be influenced by social groups and societies and their place in the world as explained in Schütz's theory of society. On the other hand Schütz believes that experiences of people are given to them and that people can also act in a reflexive way (f.e. blushing) (Campbell, 1981, p.204).
According to Schutz, there are two kinds of facts. Facts that have to be taken for granted and facts that have to be selected out as relevant to the individual´s interests. Every individual sorts out his own world. This leads to a personal ´domain of relevance´. By sorting out his ´domain of interest´ a individual has typified his situation. He creates a personal situation with problems that must be solved. “A man is a problem-setting and a problem-solving animal” (Campbell, 1981, p. 202). The individual may set himself to alter his situation by action. He wants to change his real situation to an optimal situation. Schütz calls this rational activity. It is the motivated lived experience that represents the heart of the subjective awareness.
The everyday- live is future-orientated. Schütz claims the expectations of the everyday world is expressed in the ‘in-order-to motive'. We do things in order to achieve an objective. We have fantasies of ‘having done’ things. We see a solved problem in our mind, and we want to make that situation reality.
References
- Campbell, T. (1981). Seven theories of human society. Oxford University Press: Oxford
- Springer, J. (1972). The phenomenology of the social world. Northwestern University Press: Evanston
Contributors
- Page enhanced by --FabianBusch - 17:58, 7 December 2011 (CET)
- Link added by--DennisPrince - 15:48, 16 September 2012 (CEST)
- Page enhanced by Stef Tomesen - October 23rd 2012
