Representation
From Geography
| (4 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | Ferdinand de Saussure gives meaning to his detailed work in linguistics, but also to his general view of representation and the way this model of language shaped the ‘semiotic’ approach to the problem of representation in a wide variety of cultural fields. | + | [[Ferdinand de Saussure]] gives meaning to his detailed work in linguistics, but also to his general view of representation and the way this model of language shaped the ‘semiotic’ approach to the problem of representation in a wide variety of cultural fields. |
| - | According to Saussure: ‘Language is a system of signs’. These signs can further be divided into two components named the signifier and the signified. The signifier can be seen as the form of a sign, for example the actual word or the real image. The signified can be seen as the idea or concept that you have in your head about a certain form. So the signified consists of the associations with a certain signifier (Hall, 1997). For example the signifier can be seen as the sound and the signified can be seen as the thought. The earlier mentioned linguistic sign is neither conceptual nor phonic, neither thought nor sound. Rather it is the whole of the link that unites signifier (sound) and signified (thought). The characteristics of the sign are by nature abstract and not concrete. For example Saussure said: “A sign is not a link between a thing and a name, but between a concept and a sound pattern” (Course in general linguistics, p. 66). | + | According to Saussure: ‘Language is a system of signs’. These [[sign|signs]] can further be divided into two components named the signifier and the signified. The signifier can be seen as the form of a sign, for example the actual word or the real image. The signified can be seen as the idea or concept that you have in your head about a certain form. So the signified consists of the associations with a certain signifier (Hall, 1997). For example the signifier can be seen as the sound and the signified can be seen as the thought. The earlier mentioned linguistic sign is neither conceptual nor phonic, neither thought nor sound. Rather it is the whole of the link that unites signifier (sound) and signified (thought). The characteristics of the sign are by nature abstract and not concrete. For example Saussure said: “A sign is not a link between a thing and a name, but between a concept and a sound pattern” (Course in general linguistics, p. 66). |
To produce meaning signifier and signified are both needed, but it is the relation between them, which sustains representation. This representation is changeable because over time the concept of a word can change. For example: through certain experiences people can give other meanings to concepts as before. | To produce meaning signifier and signified are both needed, but it is the relation between them, which sustains representation. This representation is changeable because over time the concept of a word can change. For example: through certain experiences people can give other meanings to concepts as before. | ||
| + | ====Example==== | ||
| + | Feminist geographers have placed a greater emphasis on questions of meaning and representation (Aitken & Valentine, 2009, p.209). | ||
| - | + | Gilles Deleuze, according to Aitken & Valentine (2009, p.307), is critical of the way in which much academic writting sees its function as representing the world. Representation is a negative procedure, because it is attempting to accurately describe things inevitably distorts and simplifies them, and the critical distance which accurate representation demands has the effect of turning that representation into a judgement. | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| + | The Orient has a representation which was produced for a European audience (Aitken & Valentine, 2009, p.152). The Europeans thought that, due to this representation, actual colonialism was prefigured at the level of culture. That in sucha way that the actual encounter with the Orient appears as a verafully durected and minutely orchestrated mise-en-scene. People were acting according to this representation, that resulted in their habits when they visited the Orient. | ||
| - | Inge Schoenmakers & Lotte Brouwer | + | ====References==== |
| + | |||
| + | Saussure, F. de (1983). Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Harris, R. La Salle: Open Court | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hall, S. (1997). Cultural representations and signifying practices. Stage: London. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Aitken, S. & Valentine, G. (2009). Approaches to human geography. Sage | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Contributors==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | *''Published by Inge Schoenmakers & Lotte Brouwer'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | *''Edited by Michiel van Rijn''--[[User:MichielVanRijn|MichielVanRijn]] 12:51, 26 October 2012 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:51, 26 October 2012
Ferdinand de Saussure gives meaning to his detailed work in linguistics, but also to his general view of representation and the way this model of language shaped the ‘semiotic’ approach to the problem of representation in a wide variety of cultural fields. According to Saussure: ‘Language is a system of signs’. These signs can further be divided into two components named the signifier and the signified. The signifier can be seen as the form of a sign, for example the actual word or the real image. The signified can be seen as the idea or concept that you have in your head about a certain form. So the signified consists of the associations with a certain signifier (Hall, 1997). For example the signifier can be seen as the sound and the signified can be seen as the thought. The earlier mentioned linguistic sign is neither conceptual nor phonic, neither thought nor sound. Rather it is the whole of the link that unites signifier (sound) and signified (thought). The characteristics of the sign are by nature abstract and not concrete. For example Saussure said: “A sign is not a link between a thing and a name, but between a concept and a sound pattern” (Course in general linguistics, p. 66).
To produce meaning signifier and signified are both needed, but it is the relation between them, which sustains representation. This representation is changeable because over time the concept of a word can change. For example: through certain experiences people can give other meanings to concepts as before.
Example
Feminist geographers have placed a greater emphasis on questions of meaning and representation (Aitken & Valentine, 2009, p.209).
Gilles Deleuze, according to Aitken & Valentine (2009, p.307), is critical of the way in which much academic writting sees its function as representing the world. Representation is a negative procedure, because it is attempting to accurately describe things inevitably distorts and simplifies them, and the critical distance which accurate representation demands has the effect of turning that representation into a judgement.
The Orient has a representation which was produced for a European audience (Aitken & Valentine, 2009, p.152). The Europeans thought that, due to this representation, actual colonialism was prefigured at the level of culture. That in sucha way that the actual encounter with the Orient appears as a verafully durected and minutely orchestrated mise-en-scene. People were acting according to this representation, that resulted in their habits when they visited the Orient.
References
Saussure, F. de (1983). Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Harris, R. La Salle: Open Court
Hall, S. (1997). Cultural representations and signifying practices. Stage: London.
Aitken, S. & Valentine, G. (2009). Approaches to human geography. Sage
Contributors
- Published by Inge Schoenmakers & Lotte Brouwer
- Edited by Michiel van Rijn--MichielVanRijn 12:51, 26 October 2012 (CEST)
