Sign
From Geography
| (5 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Definition== | ||
The word sign has various meanings. This section is about language as a system of signs. | The word sign has various meanings. This section is about language as a system of signs. | ||
The traditional linguistics see words as symbols standing in for objects in the world. In this traditional view meaning comes from the connection between the word and the real thing that the word refers to. Language is seen as a mirror of reality (Gibson-Graham, 2000, p. 96). This view was rejected by [[Ferdinand de Saussure]]. This Swiss linguistic is known as the ´father of modern linguistics´. For human geography, not his extensive linguistic work, but his view on [[representation]] is relevant. | The traditional linguistics see words as symbols standing in for objects in the world. In this traditional view meaning comes from the connection between the word and the real thing that the word refers to. Language is seen as a mirror of reality (Gibson-Graham, 2000, p. 96). This view was rejected by [[Ferdinand de Saussure]]. This Swiss linguistic is known as the ´father of modern linguistics´. For human geography, not his extensive linguistic work, but his view on [[representation]] is relevant. | ||
| - | De Saussure argued that words are signs. "Sounds, images, written words, paintings, photographs, etc. function as signs within language only when they serve to express or communicate ideas..." (Hall, 1997, p. 31). The sign consists of two parts: the [[signifier]] (the form) and the signified (the idea or concept of the form in our head). These two elements together, and the relation between them, make up representation. Representations, or the meaning of words, are also shaped by cultural and linguistic codes. | + | De Saussure argued that words are signs. "Sounds, images, written words, paintings, photographs, etc. function as signs within language only when they serve to express or communicate ideas..." (Hall, 1997, p. 31). The sign consists of two parts: the [[signifier]] (the form) and the signified (the idea or concept of the form in our head). These two elements together, and the relation between them, make up representation. Representations, or the meaning of words, are also shaped by cultural and linguistic codes. Meaning is created by social constructs so signs do not possess a fixed or essential meaning. "There is no natural or inevitable link between the signifier and the signified." The meaning of a sign is determined by the relation to other pairs of elements in the system of signs. |
For example the word "school" in the traditional linguistic view refers to a building where people are educated. In Saussure’s view the word "school" is a sign that consists of both the spoken or written word SCHOOL and the IDEA (or concept) of a building that is different from other buildings like an office or a house because of the culturally encoded practices that take place in and around it like teaching. So the meaning of the word "school" is not pregiven, but is signified in our minds. The meaning of the signifier-signified pair is constituted in relation with signs of other kinds of buildings. | For example the word "school" in the traditional linguistic view refers to a building where people are educated. In Saussure’s view the word "school" is a sign that consists of both the spoken or written word SCHOOL and the IDEA (or concept) of a building that is different from other buildings like an office or a house because of the culturally encoded practices that take place in and around it like teaching. So the meaning of the word "school" is not pregiven, but is signified in our minds. The meaning of the signifier-signified pair is constituted in relation with signs of other kinds of buildings. | ||
| - | A good example in real life of Saussure's distinction between signifier and signified is de Zeche Zollverein in the former industrial | + | ==Geographical example== |
| + | A good example in real life of Saussure's distinction between signifier and signified is de Zeche Zollverein in the former industrial Ruhr district in Germany. After the decline in industrial activity in that area, the factories where transformed to cultural centres that host all kind of cultural events. As a result this area became cultural capital of Europe in 2010. In this way the word "factory" changed meaning from a, pre-Saussurian meaning as a "building where production takes place" (Gibson-Graham, 2000, p.96), to a meaning that "is created within a complex social structure of relation and difference" (Gibson-Graham, 2000, p.96). | ||
| + | == Distinction: Structuralism vs. Post-structuralism view on signs == | ||
| + | The [[structuralism]] view of [[Ferdinand de Saussure]] is that complex social phenomena associated with signs are underlying structures that have to be traced and examined. "This structures of language can be thought of as a fishing-net in which each sign has its place as one of the knots in the net. When the net is stretched out, the knot is fixed in position by its distance from the other knots in the net, just as the sign is defined by its distance from the other signs. Much of structuralists rests on the assumption that signs are locked in particular relationships with one another. Every sign has a particular location in the net and its meaning is fixed"(Jørgensen & Phillips, 2002, p. 11). | ||
| - | + | [[Post-structuralism]] (and later structuralists) reject structuralism view of language as a stable, unchangeable and totalizing structure(Jørgensen & Phillips, 2002, p. 11). They think it is impossible to fully understand the ´truth of language´ by discovering underlying structures. A fixed relationship between a signifier and the signified is denied by poststructuralist philosophers. Post-structuralists do not believe that signs have such fixed positions as the metaphor of the fishing-net suggests(Jørgensen & Phillips, 2002, p. 11). They think that structures do exist but always in a temporary and not necessarily consistent state. They think language is a set of continually reshaped relations. This constitution of meaning can be a subject of struggle between different groups in society. For example, feminists will try to enlarge the amount of meanings of the word ´woman´ that have emancipating meanings. At the other side they attempt to diminish the usage of meanings with patriarchal associations (Gibson-Graham, 2000, p. 96). | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| - | + | ==References== | |
* Hall, S. (1997). Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage publications. | * Hall, S. (1997). Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage publications. | ||
* Gibson, Graham, J.K. (2000). Poststructural Interventions. Oxford: Blackwell. | * Gibson, Graham, J.K. (2000). Poststructural Interventions. Oxford: Blackwell. | ||
| + | * Jørgensen, M.W. & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis: as theory and method. Sage, London | ||
| - | + | ==Contributors== | |
* ''page created by --[[User:SusanVerbeij|SusanVerbeij]] and --[[User:Boudewijn Idema|BoudewijnIdema]] 10:43, 10 September 2011 (UTC) | * ''page created by --[[User:SusanVerbeij|SusanVerbeij]] and --[[User:Boudewijn Idema|BoudewijnIdema]] 10:43, 10 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| - | + | * ''Page edited by Thaddeus Bergé, 12-11-2011'' | |
| - | + | * ''Page enhanced bij [[User:JensLubben|JensLubben]] 19:14, 16 December 2011 (CET)'' | |
| + | * ''Page edited by--[[User:HennyLi|HennyLi]] 18:30, 24 October 2012 (CEST)'' | ||
Latest revision as of 16:30, 24 October 2012
Contents |
Definition
The word sign has various meanings. This section is about language as a system of signs.
The traditional linguistics see words as symbols standing in for objects in the world. In this traditional view meaning comes from the connection between the word and the real thing that the word refers to. Language is seen as a mirror of reality (Gibson-Graham, 2000, p. 96). This view was rejected by Ferdinand de Saussure. This Swiss linguistic is known as the ´father of modern linguistics´. For human geography, not his extensive linguistic work, but his view on representation is relevant. De Saussure argued that words are signs. "Sounds, images, written words, paintings, photographs, etc. function as signs within language only when they serve to express or communicate ideas..." (Hall, 1997, p. 31). The sign consists of two parts: the signifier (the form) and the signified (the idea or concept of the form in our head). These two elements together, and the relation between them, make up representation. Representations, or the meaning of words, are also shaped by cultural and linguistic codes. Meaning is created by social constructs so signs do not possess a fixed or essential meaning. "There is no natural or inevitable link between the signifier and the signified." The meaning of a sign is determined by the relation to other pairs of elements in the system of signs.
For example the word "school" in the traditional linguistic view refers to a building where people are educated. In Saussure’s view the word "school" is a sign that consists of both the spoken or written word SCHOOL and the IDEA (or concept) of a building that is different from other buildings like an office or a house because of the culturally encoded practices that take place in and around it like teaching. So the meaning of the word "school" is not pregiven, but is signified in our minds. The meaning of the signifier-signified pair is constituted in relation with signs of other kinds of buildings.
Geographical example
A good example in real life of Saussure's distinction between signifier and signified is de Zeche Zollverein in the former industrial Ruhr district in Germany. After the decline in industrial activity in that area, the factories where transformed to cultural centres that host all kind of cultural events. As a result this area became cultural capital of Europe in 2010. In this way the word "factory" changed meaning from a, pre-Saussurian meaning as a "building where production takes place" (Gibson-Graham, 2000, p.96), to a meaning that "is created within a complex social structure of relation and difference" (Gibson-Graham, 2000, p.96).
Distinction: Structuralism vs. Post-structuralism view on signs
The structuralism view of Ferdinand de Saussure is that complex social phenomena associated with signs are underlying structures that have to be traced and examined. "This structures of language can be thought of as a fishing-net in which each sign has its place as one of the knots in the net. When the net is stretched out, the knot is fixed in position by its distance from the other knots in the net, just as the sign is defined by its distance from the other signs. Much of structuralists rests on the assumption that signs are locked in particular relationships with one another. Every sign has a particular location in the net and its meaning is fixed"(Jørgensen & Phillips, 2002, p. 11).
Post-structuralism (and later structuralists) reject structuralism view of language as a stable, unchangeable and totalizing structure(Jørgensen & Phillips, 2002, p. 11). They think it is impossible to fully understand the ´truth of language´ by discovering underlying structures. A fixed relationship between a signifier and the signified is denied by poststructuralist philosophers. Post-structuralists do not believe that signs have such fixed positions as the metaphor of the fishing-net suggests(Jørgensen & Phillips, 2002, p. 11). They think that structures do exist but always in a temporary and not necessarily consistent state. They think language is a set of continually reshaped relations. This constitution of meaning can be a subject of struggle between different groups in society. For example, feminists will try to enlarge the amount of meanings of the word ´woman´ that have emancipating meanings. At the other side they attempt to diminish the usage of meanings with patriarchal associations (Gibson-Graham, 2000, p. 96).
References
- Hall, S. (1997). Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage publications.
- Gibson, Graham, J.K. (2000). Poststructural Interventions. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Jørgensen, M.W. & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis: as theory and method. Sage, London
Contributors
- page created by --SusanVerbeij and --BoudewijnIdema 10:43, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- Page edited by Thaddeus Bergé, 12-11-2011
- Page enhanced bij JensLubben 19:14, 16 December 2011 (CET)
- Page edited by--HennyLi 18:30, 24 October 2012 (CEST)
