Actant
From Geography
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | An actant is strongly related to the Actor Netwerk Theory, created by Bruno Latour. The ANT perspective attempts to explain and interpret social and technological evolution using neither technical -material nor social reductionism, but rather it incorporates a 'principle of generalized symmetry', that what is human and non-human should be integrated into the same conceptual framework. Hereby network should not be seen as a structure like the World Wide Web, so much as a set of transformations. The meaning of actor then engages his thought at considerable length, much of which does not concern us here, but some does. Actor and network are not to be seen as two things - like individual and society - but rather as two faces of the same phenomenon. He then turns to theory, and lastly, briefly, to the hyphen (Gregory, Johnston, Pratt, Watts & Whatmore, 2009). | + | An actant is strongly related to the [[Actor Netwerk Theory]], created by [[Bruno Latour]]. The ANT perspective attempts to explain and interpret social and technological evolution using neither technical -material nor social reductionism, but rather it incorporates a 'principle of generalized symmetry', that what is human and non-human should be integrated into the same conceptual framework. Hereby network should not be seen as a structure like the World Wide Web, so much as a set of transformations. The meaning of actor then engages his thought at considerable length, much of which does not concern us here, but some does. Actor and network are not to be seen as two things - like individual and society - but rather as two faces of the same phenomenon. He then turns to theory, and lastly, briefly, to the hyphen (Gregory, Johnston, Pratt, Watts & Whatmore, 2009). |
In this case of the Actor Network Theory actants are referred to non human actors. The ANT community often use the word 'actant' rather than 'actor', in order to overcome the human connotations of the latter word. However in most of the times non-humans as wel as humans are both referred tot as 'actants'. What has raised concerns about human agency and identity, the ideas of volunteerism and determinism, as well as to whom (which scientists) would fall the task of discovering, interpreting and defining the parameters of vast networks of people and things (Latour, 1997). In addition, ANT attempts to dissolve the micro-/macro- distinction which it asserts as historically problematic in social theory (Gregory et al., 2009). | In this case of the Actor Network Theory actants are referred to non human actors. The ANT community often use the word 'actant' rather than 'actor', in order to overcome the human connotations of the latter word. However in most of the times non-humans as wel as humans are both referred tot as 'actants'. What has raised concerns about human agency and identity, the ideas of volunteerism and determinism, as well as to whom (which scientists) would fall the task of discovering, interpreting and defining the parameters of vast networks of people and things (Latour, 1997). In addition, ANT attempts to dissolve the micro-/macro- distinction which it asserts as historically problematic in social theory (Gregory et al., 2009). | ||
Revision as of 13:54, 18 October 2010
An actant is strongly related to the Actor Netwerk Theory, created by Bruno Latour. The ANT perspective attempts to explain and interpret social and technological evolution using neither technical -material nor social reductionism, but rather it incorporates a 'principle of generalized symmetry', that what is human and non-human should be integrated into the same conceptual framework. Hereby network should not be seen as a structure like the World Wide Web, so much as a set of transformations. The meaning of actor then engages his thought at considerable length, much of which does not concern us here, but some does. Actor and network are not to be seen as two things - like individual and society - but rather as two faces of the same phenomenon. He then turns to theory, and lastly, briefly, to the hyphen (Gregory, Johnston, Pratt, Watts & Whatmore, 2009).
In this case of the Actor Network Theory actants are referred to non human actors. The ANT community often use the word 'actant' rather than 'actor', in order to overcome the human connotations of the latter word. However in most of the times non-humans as wel as humans are both referred tot as 'actants'. What has raised concerns about human agency and identity, the ideas of volunteerism and determinism, as well as to whom (which scientists) would fall the task of discovering, interpreting and defining the parameters of vast networks of people and things (Latour, 1997). In addition, ANT attempts to dissolve the micro-/macro- distinction which it asserts as historically problematic in social theory (Gregory et al., 2009).
Main question here is what it does mean to be an actant. Bruno Latour (1997) said the following about 'being an actant': "actantiality is not what an actor does ... but what provides actants with their actions, with their subjectivity, with their intentionality, with their morality."
References:
Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M. & Whatmore, S. (2009). The Dictionary of Human Geography, 5th edition. London: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Latour, B. (1997). The trouble with the Actor-Networktheory. Danish philosophy journal, vol. 25, n°3 et 4, pp. 47-64, 1997.
By Luuk Robers & Paul Leemans
