Boundary of social systems
From Geography
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | Social systems differ from each other and therefore are defined by boundaries. This is what Koch in short implies with his analysis of the family. "Like every social system the family is a closed system. The notion of closure is, thereby, related to the operational process, i.e. for a family to exist as a family it is necessary to draw a boundary. This is executed by the family itself" (Koch, 2005, p.6). | + | Social systems differ from each other and therefore are defined by boundaries. This is what Koch in short implies with his analysis of the family. "Like every social system the family is a closed system. The notion of closure is, thereby, related to the operational process, i.e. for a family to exist as a family it is necessary to draw a boundary. This is executed by the family itself" (Koch, 2005, p.6). These social systems can often be connected to a spatial entity, therefore boundaries of social systems often overlay the boundaries of physical environments. Or Koch (2005, p.6) puts it even to the extreme, saying "it is at least necessary for it [a social system] to be linked to psychic systems – and what I would like to point out to spatial systems". |
Though, in the eyes of Deleuze borders, as in the sense of differences are not existing until they are found to be valid. If a family would be studied by Deleuze, he would perhaps only notice the coherence and a shared identity when the family under study is compared to another family. From his perspective something can only be debarqued when it is opposed to something else. This ambiguity derives through language: "it is language which fixes the limits ... but it is language as well which transcends the limits and restores them to the infinite equivalence of an unlimited becoming" (Deleuze, n.d., p.40) | Though, in the eyes of Deleuze borders, as in the sense of differences are not existing until they are found to be valid. If a family would be studied by Deleuze, he would perhaps only notice the coherence and a shared identity when the family under study is compared to another family. From his perspective something can only be debarqued when it is opposed to something else. This ambiguity derives through language: "it is language which fixes the limits ... but it is language as well which transcends the limits and restores them to the infinite equivalence of an unlimited becoming" (Deleuze, n.d., p.40) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Assignment 9 (Luhmann)''' | '''Assignment 9 (Luhmann)''' | ||
| + | |||
Lorenzo Goudsmits (0827991) | Lorenzo Goudsmits (0827991) | ||
| + | |||
Lisanne Dols | Lisanne Dols | ||
| Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
== Sources == | == Sources == | ||
Deleuze (?). ''What Is Becoming?'' in Constantin v Bounds (ed.) The Deleuze Reader. New York: Colombia University press | Deleuze (?). ''What Is Becoming?'' in Constantin v Bounds (ed.) The Deleuze Reader. New York: Colombia University press | ||
| + | |||
Koch, A. (2005). ''Autopoietic spatial systems: the significance of actor network theory and system theory for the development of a system theoretical approach of space.'' in Social Geography, nr.1, p.5-14 | Koch, A. (2005). ''Autopoietic spatial systems: the significance of actor network theory and system theory for the development of a system theoretical approach of space.'' in Social Geography, nr.1, p.5-14 | ||
Revision as of 11:06, 18 October 2010
Social systems differ from each other and therefore are defined by boundaries. This is what Koch in short implies with his analysis of the family. "Like every social system the family is a closed system. The notion of closure is, thereby, related to the operational process, i.e. for a family to exist as a family it is necessary to draw a boundary. This is executed by the family itself" (Koch, 2005, p.6). These social systems can often be connected to a spatial entity, therefore boundaries of social systems often overlay the boundaries of physical environments. Or Koch (2005, p.6) puts it even to the extreme, saying "it is at least necessary for it [a social system] to be linked to psychic systems – and what I would like to point out to spatial systems".
Though, in the eyes of Deleuze borders, as in the sense of differences are not existing until they are found to be valid. If a family would be studied by Deleuze, he would perhaps only notice the coherence and a shared identity when the family under study is compared to another family. From his perspective something can only be debarqued when it is opposed to something else. This ambiguity derives through language: "it is language which fixes the limits ... but it is language as well which transcends the limits and restores them to the infinite equivalence of an unlimited becoming" (Deleuze, n.d., p.40)
Assignment 9 (Luhmann)
Lorenzo Goudsmits (0827991)
Lisanne Dols
Sources
Deleuze (?). What Is Becoming? in Constantin v Bounds (ed.) The Deleuze Reader. New York: Colombia University press
Koch, A. (2005). Autopoietic spatial systems: the significance of actor network theory and system theory for the development of a system theoretical approach of space. in Social Geography, nr.1, p.5-14
