Talk:Karl Otto Apel
From Geography
(Created page with "1. Relevance: 6, Karl Otto Apel is relevant for this course. But this text need more depth will it be relevant for this course. 2. A) Well-written: 6, it is clear B) Comprehens...")
Newer edit →
Revision as of 14:00, 17 October 2012
1. Relevance: 6, Karl Otto Apel is relevant for this course. But this text need more depth will it be relevant for this course.
2. A) Well-written: 6, it is clear B) Comprehensive: the text is very short, for fully understanding more depth required
3. A) References: 8, The reference is good, but you need more for a good text. B) Inline citations: 7
4. A) Main aspects: 7, main aspects are short mentioned. But there need to be more information about his way of thinking. B) Focused : 7
5. Neutral: 8, it is neutral written.
6. Stable: 8, it does not change frequently.
7. A) a lead: 7, good introduction. B) appropiate structure: 7, there is a logical and hierarchical structure. C) categories: 6
8. Illustrated : 7 A) Copyright status: 7 B) Relevant suitable captions: 9
9. Length: 7, little short
Evaluated by Lotte den Boogert, 17 october 2012
