Critical geography
From Geography
KoenMolenaar (Talk | contribs) |
KoenMolenaar (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The last and probably most accepted ideology is [[Humanistic Geography]]. It argues that human research should always be qualitative instead of quantitative. | The last and probably most accepted ideology is [[Humanistic Geography]]. It argues that human research should always be qualitative instead of quantitative. | ||
| - | References: | + | ==References: == |
Harald, B., Engel-Di Mauro (2008). Critical Geographies: A Collection of Readings | Harald, B., Engel-Di Mauro (2008). Critical Geographies: A Collection of Readings | ||
Revision as of 07:52, 22 October 2012
Critical geography can be seen as a critique on positivism introduced by the [Quantitative Revolution]. Several ideologies originated from this geography.
One of them is Behavioural Geography which was not new but made a comeback. It tries to challenge quantitative side of geography and provides a greater understanding of how people perceive space and place.
Radical Geography is the second ideological concept. It argues that quantative research is not usefull when there are no solutions nor alternatives. Therefore it argues that positivist quantative methods are useless.
The last and probably most accepted ideology is Humanistic Geography. It argues that human research should always be qualitative instead of quantitative.
References:
Harald, B., Engel-Di Mauro (2008). Critical Geographies: A Collection of Readings
- Page created by Paul van den Hogen --PaulHogen 15:07, 24 September 2012
Page enhanced by Koen Molenaar
