Talk:Possibilism

From Geography

Revision as of 15:24, 23 October 2012

Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient)

1. Relevance: 9: The relevance of this page for the course spatial action is high. The concept of possibilism can be linked to the topics around structures.

2. Well-written: 8: The page is mostly well-written, the writers have used correct English. Further there is used a basic standard, but it seems OK.

3. well-researched: 8: The research is done OK. The application of the APA guidlines is complete and verifiable. It's a good thing that they used different sources, to compare and confirm what possibilism is about.

4. Broad in its coverage: 9: the page adresses the main aspects of this topic. It's good that there's a conclusion in the end of the paragraph, indicated by the word thus. That word thus shows also that it stayed focused on the topic.

5. Neutral: 9: The text is written neutral. There is no criticizing performed by the authors.

6. Stable: 7: The page is stable, and only enhanced by one people who made a conclusion and made the concept more clearly, but leave the existing text alone.

7. Well-structured: 7: There is only one heading, and thats possiblism. So there is no hierarchical system of headings. So that's a thing to do for next time. It's good that there are two links: one to Vidal de la Blanche and one to environmental determinism. The entry is not categorized, so that's why my rating is a little bit low.

8. Illustrated: -: There is no illustration.

9. Length: 9: The length of the page is good, it stays to the point, which makes it easy to read.