Talk:Post-structuralism
From Geography
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
1. Relevance: 10-10 The post-structuralism is one of the main topics of the Spatial Action course. Therefore it is very relevant. | 1. Relevance: 10-10 The post-structuralism is one of the main topics of the Spatial Action course. Therefore it is very relevant. | ||
- | 2 | + | |
- | + | ||
- | 3 | + | 2 a. Well Written: 8-10 Spelling and grammar are correct. |
- | + | ||
- | 4 | + | 2 b. Comprehensive: 8-10 There is an appropriate use of jargon and the content is very clear through the use of sentences. |
- | + | ||
- | 5 | + | |
+ | 3 a. Well researched: 7-10 The upper reference is not complete but the sources are diverse although not many are used. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3 b. in-line citations: 8-10 The inline citations are good. Some are quotes and some are taken over in the own words. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 4 a. Main Aspects: 9-10 All the important thinkers and theories are mentioned. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4 b. focused: 10-10 All the details are useful. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 5 Neutral: 10-10 There is no personal opinion in this text. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
6. Stable: 10-10 No edit war found... | 6. Stable: 10-10 No edit war found... | ||
- | 7. a. Lead: 8-10 The lead is well written and gives an overview but is not really separated from the text | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | 7.a. Lead: 8-10 The lead is well written and gives an overview but is not really separated from the text. | |
+ | |||
+ | 7 b. Structure: 6-10 The structure is quit clear, but there is no table of content and no hierarchical section. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 7 c. Categories: 5-10 No categorization. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 8 a. Illustrated: No rating: It was not possible to put in pictures trough out the course. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 8 b. Relevant: No rating... | ||
+ | |||
+ | 9. Length: 9-10 Very well focused on the topic, could have a little more detail in it. |
Latest revision as of 08:56, 24 October 2012
1. Relevance: 10-10 The post-structuralism is one of the main topics of the Spatial Action course. Therefore it is very relevant.
2 a. Well Written: 8-10 Spelling and grammar are correct.
2 b. Comprehensive: 8-10 There is an appropriate use of jargon and the content is very clear through the use of sentences.
3 a. Well researched: 7-10 The upper reference is not complete but the sources are diverse although not many are used.
3 b. in-line citations: 8-10 The inline citations are good. Some are quotes and some are taken over in the own words.
4 a. Main Aspects: 9-10 All the important thinkers and theories are mentioned.
4 b. focused: 10-10 All the details are useful.
5 Neutral: 10-10 There is no personal opinion in this text.
6. Stable: 10-10 No edit war found...
7.a. Lead: 8-10 The lead is well written and gives an overview but is not really separated from the text.
7 b. Structure: 6-10 The structure is quit clear, but there is no table of content and no hierarchical section.
7 c. Categories: 5-10 No categorization.
8 a. Illustrated: No rating: It was not possible to put in pictures trough out the course.
8 b. Relevant: No rating...
9. Length: 9-10 Very well focused on the topic, could have a little more detail in it.