Talk:Because motive
From Geography
BertHegger (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "1. Relevance: It is relevant for this course. Rating: 9 (0-10) Comments: The because motive is part of the material studied in this course. 2. Well-written: a) well-written: its...") |
BertHegger (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
b) it provides in-line citations (including page numbers) from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the APA guidelines. | b) it provides in-line citations (including page numbers) from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the APA guidelines. | ||
| - | Rating: | + | Rating: 7(0-10) |
| - | Comments: | + | Comments: There are no direct citations, but there are examples of the because motive. |
| + | |||
4. Broad in its coverage: | 4. Broad in its coverage: | ||
a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; | a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; | ||
| - | Rating: | + | Rating: 8(0-10) |
| - | Comments: | + | Comments: All aspects of the because motive are covered. |
| + | |||
b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. | b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. | ||
| - | Rating: | + | Rating: 7(0-10) |
| - | Comments: | + | Comments: It stays focussed on the topic, although the text could have been more concise. |
| + | |||
5. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each. | 5. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
| - | Rating: | + | Rating: 8 (0-10) |
| - | Comments: | + | Comments: Viewpoints are represented fairly and without bias. |
| + | |||
6. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | 6. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
| - | Rating: | + | Rating: 7 (0-10) |
| - | Comments: | + | Comments: Two people have worked on this wiki. Still, it seems to be stable and forms a coherent whole. |
| + | |||
7. Well-structured: | 7. Well-structured: | ||
a) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; | a) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; | ||
Rating: …… (0-10) | Rating: …… (0-10) | ||
Comments: … | Comments: … | ||
| + | |||
b) appropriate structure: a system of hierarchical section headings and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents. | b) appropriate structure: a system of hierarchical section headings and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents. | ||
Rating: …… (0-10) | Rating: …… (0-10) | ||
Revision as of 14:33, 24 October 2012
1. Relevance: It is relevant for this course. Rating: 9 (0-10) Comments: The because motive is part of the material studied in this course.
2. Well-written: a) well-written: its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard; the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; Rating: 8 (0-10) Comments: Spelling and grammar are correct. The text is easily readable, which is a positive aspect of this wiki.
b) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context. Rating: 8 (0-10) Comments: No major facts are neglected. The because motive is described in a clear and complete way.
3. well-researched: Factually accurate and verifiable: a) it provides references to all sources of information following the APA guidelines; Rating: 8(0-10) Comments: References in the text and in the list of literature is present.
b) it provides in-line citations (including page numbers) from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the APA guidelines. Rating: 7(0-10) Comments: There are no direct citations, but there are examples of the because motive.
4. Broad in its coverage: a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; Rating: 8(0-10) Comments: All aspects of the because motive are covered.
b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. Rating: 7(0-10) Comments: It stays focussed on the topic, although the text could have been more concise.
5. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each. Rating: 8 (0-10) Comments: Viewpoints are represented fairly and without bias.
6. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Rating: 7 (0-10) Comments: Two people have worked on this wiki. Still, it seems to be stable and forms a coherent whole.
7. Well-structured: a) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: …
b) appropriate structure: a system of hierarchical section headings and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents. Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: … c) categories: is the entry categorized in a correct way? (Which categories are missing?) Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: … 8. Illustrated: if possible, by images, maps, schematic overviews: a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: … b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: … 9. Length: It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style. Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: …
