Talk:Humanistic approach

From Geography

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
StefTomesen (Talk | contribs)
(Created page with "Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient) 1. Relevance: 9/10: Humanistic geography is very relavant. It's a important part of the action theory. It w...")
Newer edit →

Revision as of 14:51, 25 October 2012

Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient) 1. Relevance: 9/10: Humanistic geography is very relavant. It's a important part of the action theory. It was an approach that throught about people and their actions. 2. Well-written: 6/10: I do not think it is well written. The structure of the text should be different. for example: the part about the origin of the approach shoud be one the fist sentenses. 3. well-researched: 7/10: The information is very clear and extensive, but I think that the writer should mention more important researchers and their philosophies in the text. 4. Broad in its coverage: 6/10: Maybe, their could be said a little bit more about the work of Yi-Fu Tuan 5. Neutral: 9/10:. The Writer does not give his oppinion about the text. 6. Stable: 7/10:. 7. Well-structured: 5/10: It is not well structured. In the first part of the entrie, the structure has to be menioned. Subheading is also neaded. 8. Illustrated: -/10:. There are no illustrations 9. Length: 6/10: It could be a bit more extensive

Personal tools