Talk:Humanistic approach
From Geography
StefTomesen (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient) 1. Relevance: 9/10: Humanistic geography is very relavant. It's a important part of the action theory. It w...") |
StefTomesen (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient) | Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient) | ||
1. Relevance: 9/10: Humanistic geography is very relavant. It's a important part of the action theory. It was an approach that throught about people and their actions. | 1. Relevance: 9/10: Humanistic geography is very relavant. It's a important part of the action theory. It was an approach that throught about people and their actions. | ||
| + | |||
2. Well-written: 6/10: I do not think it is well written. The structure of the text should be different. for example: the part about the origin of the approach shoud be one the fist sentenses. | 2. Well-written: 6/10: I do not think it is well written. The structure of the text should be different. for example: the part about the origin of the approach shoud be one the fist sentenses. | ||
| + | |||
3. well-researched: 7/10: The information is very clear and extensive, but I think that the writer should mention more important researchers and their philosophies in the text. | 3. well-researched: 7/10: The information is very clear and extensive, but I think that the writer should mention more important researchers and their philosophies in the text. | ||
| - | 4. Broad in its coverage: 6/10: Maybe, their could be said a little bit more about the work of Yi-Fu Tuan | + | |
| + | 4. Broad in its coverage: 6/10: Maybe, their could be said a little bit more about the work of Yi-Fu Tuan. | ||
| + | |||
5. Neutral: 9/10:. The Writer does not give his oppinion about the text. | 5. Neutral: 9/10:. The Writer does not give his oppinion about the text. | ||
| + | |||
6. Stable: 7/10:. | 6. Stable: 7/10:. | ||
| + | |||
7. Well-structured: 5/10: It is not well structured. In the first part of the entrie, the structure has to be menioned. Subheading is also neaded. | 7. Well-structured: 5/10: It is not well structured. In the first part of the entrie, the structure has to be menioned. Subheading is also neaded. | ||
| + | |||
8. Illustrated: -/10:. There are no illustrations | 8. Illustrated: -/10:. There are no illustrations | ||
| + | |||
9. Length: 6/10: It could be a bit more extensive | 9. Length: 6/10: It could be a bit more extensive | ||
Latest revision as of 14:51, 25 October 2012
Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient) 1. Relevance: 9/10: Humanistic geography is very relavant. It's a important part of the action theory. It was an approach that throught about people and their actions.
2. Well-written: 6/10: I do not think it is well written. The structure of the text should be different. for example: the part about the origin of the approach shoud be one the fist sentenses.
3. well-researched: 7/10: The information is very clear and extensive, but I think that the writer should mention more important researchers and their philosophies in the text.
4. Broad in its coverage: 6/10: Maybe, their could be said a little bit more about the work of Yi-Fu Tuan.
5. Neutral: 9/10:. The Writer does not give his oppinion about the text.
6. Stable: 7/10:.
7. Well-structured: 5/10: It is not well structured. In the first part of the entrie, the structure has to be menioned. Subheading is also neaded.
8. Illustrated: -/10:. There are no illustrations
9. Length: 6/10: It could be a bit more extensive
