Talk:Stream of consciousness
From Geography
(Created page with "1. Relevance: 8/10: The subject is an important part of the phenomenology 2. Well-written: 8/10: The writer has a professional style. The text has a good structure; it starts wit...")
Newer edit →
Revision as of 14:55, 26 October 2012
1. Relevance: 8/10: The subject is an important part of the phenomenology 2. Well-written: 8/10: The writer has a professional style. The text has a good structure; it starts with a general description of the term, after that, researchers are mentioned and the writer becomes more specific. 3. Well-researched: 8/10: It's well researched. The right researchers are linked to the term. 4. Broad in its coverage: 7/10: Maybe the link to Alfred Schütz could described a bit more comprehensive 5. Neutral: 9/10: 6. Stable: 9/10: 7. Well-structured: 8/10: Great structure, see 2. 8. Illustrated: -/10: There are no illustrations. I do not think that there are pictures and illustrations needed. 9. Length: 7/10: Every sentence is relevant for the whole story, in that way it does not become lengthy.
Evaluated by StefTomesen 16:55, 26 October 2012 (CEST)
