Knowledge
From Geography
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Contextual meaning == | == Contextual meaning == | ||
| - | Within poststructuralist perspective knowledge is understood as multiple, contradictory, and powerful rather than as singular, cumulative and neutral. Knowledge is not seen as reflective of meaning already existing in objects, rather as constantly being constructed and re-constructed in [[discourse]] (Hall, 1997 pp.44). Thus | + | Within poststructuralist perspective knowledge is understood as multiple, contradictory, and powerful rather than as singular, cumulative and neutral. Knowledge is not seen as reflective of meaning already existing in objects, rather as constantly being constructed and re-constructed in [[discourse]] (Hall, 1997 pp.44). Thus knowledge is seen to actively shape reality than passively reflecting it. Knowledge, in this sense, is seen as a social process in its own right.Therefore, there can be no accurate and inaccurate knowledge, or low or high knowledge, instead there are varying knowledges based on the varying effects they have on different subjects, the institutions and practices they allow and reject or suppress(Gibson-Graham, 2000,pp.95-101). |
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
Revision as of 13:21, 15 September 2011
Contents |
Background
Conceptions of knowing within theoretical approaches, practices and ideologies in geography significantly vary. For instance, between modernist conceptions of knowledge and the perspectives of knowledge in post-structuralism. Understanding how an approach conceptualises knowledge is crucial because of the implications this has on research.
Contextual meaning
Within poststructuralist perspective knowledge is understood as multiple, contradictory, and powerful rather than as singular, cumulative and neutral. Knowledge is not seen as reflective of meaning already existing in objects, rather as constantly being constructed and re-constructed in discourse (Hall, 1997 pp.44). Thus knowledge is seen to actively shape reality than passively reflecting it. Knowledge, in this sense, is seen as a social process in its own right.Therefore, there can be no accurate and inaccurate knowledge, or low or high knowledge, instead there are varying knowledges based on the varying effects they have on different subjects, the institutions and practices they allow and reject or suppress(Gibson-Graham, 2000,pp.95-101).
References
- Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2000), 'Poststructural Interventions', in T.Barnes & R.Sheppard(eds.) A Companion to Economic Geography. Oxford: Blackwell
- Hall, Stuart. (ed.) (1997), 'Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices'. Sage. London. UK
Contributors
- "page created by Kolar Aparna"--Kolaraparna 11:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
