Talk:Post-structuralism

From Geography

Revision as of 08:48, 24 October 2012 by MarliseHoekstra (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

1. Relevance: 10-10 The post-structuralism is one of the main topics of the Spatial Action course. Therefore it is very relevant. 2. a. Well Written: 8-10 Spelling and grammar are correct.

  b. Comprehensive: 8-10 There is an appropriate use of jargon and the content is very clear through the use of sentences.

3. a. Well researched: 7-10 The upper reference is not complete but the sources are diverse although not many are used.

  b. in-line citations: 8-10 The inline citations are good. Some are quotes and some are taken over in the own words.

4. a. Main Aspects: 9-10 All the important thinkers and theories are mentioned.

  b. focused: 10-10 All the details are usefull

5. a. Neutral: 10-10 There is no personal opninion in this text 6. Stable: 10-10 No edit war found... 7. a. Lead: 8-10 The lead is well written and gives an overview but is not really separated from the text

  b. Structure: 6-10 The structure is quit clear, but there is no table of content and no hierarchical section.
  c.
Personal tools