Talk:Domain of relevance

From Geography

1. Relevance: 6 Usefull terminology, because Schutz is an important part of the course.

2. Well-written a) well-written: 5 I am still not really sure what domain of relevance is after reading this page. b) comprehensive: 5 Important things are missing in this explanation of this concept.

3. well-researched a) it provides references to all sources of information following the APA guidelines: 6 Sources are added under references, but not in the text. b) it provides in-line citations (including page numbers) from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the APA guidelines: 5 Sources missing in the text.

4. Broad in its coverage a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic: 5 Too short and missing important explanations to understand what the subject is about. b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail: / Hard to say, because of the lack of information about the subject.

5. Neutral: 10 it's neutral.

6. Stable: 8 It is a subject that isn't part of a discourse.

7. Well-structured a) a lead: 3 Not available b) appropriate structure: 6 Not really necessary due to the shortage of the text. c) categories: 1 Missing

8. Illustrated a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 6 Not available, but it would be usefull in this page. b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: /

9. Length: 5 Too short with not enough information.

Evaluated by Malou van Woerkum, 16-10-2012