Talk:Karl Otto Apel

From Geography

Revision as of 14:00, 17 October 2012 by LotteDenBoogert (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

1. Relevance: 6, Karl Otto Apel is relevant for this course. But this text need more depth will it be relevant for this course.

2. A) Well-written: 6, it is clear B) Comprehensive: the text is very short, for fully understanding more depth required

3. A) References: 8, The reference is good, but you need more for a good text. B) Inline citations: 7

4. A) Main aspects: 7, main aspects are short mentioned. But there need to be more information about his way of thinking. B) Focused : 7

5. Neutral: 8, it is neutral written.

6. Stable: 8, it does not change frequently.

7. A) a lead: 7, good introduction. B) appropiate structure: 7, there is a logical and hierarchical structure. C) categories: 6

8. Illustrated  : 7 A) Copyright status: 7 B) Relevant suitable captions: 9

9. Length: 7, little short


Evaluated by Lotte den Boogert, 17 october 2012

Personal tools