Talk:Hybridity
From Geography
1. Relevance
Rating: 7
Comments: During this course, the concept 'hybridity' is discussed sometimes.
2. Well-written
a) well-written: its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard; the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct;
Rating: 8
Comments: it is easy to read and written well.
b) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context.
Rating: 6
Comments: It is raher short, it could be more extensive
3. well-researched
a) it provides references to all sources of information following the APA guidelines;
Rating: 2
Comments: All references are missing.
b) it provides in-line citations (including page numbers) from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the APA guidelines.
Rating: 2
Comments: All references are missing
4. Broad in its coverage
a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;
Rating: 7
Comments: Everything is clear when I read it. But it could be more extensive
b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
Rating: 6
Comments: I think that there are some unneccessary details.
5. Neutral
Rating: 8
Comments: Yes, it is written neutral.
6. Stable
Rating: 8
Comments: Yes, it is stable
7. Well-structured
a) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
Rating: 8
Comments: There is a good structure.
b) appropriate structure: a system of hierarchical section headings and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents.
Rating: 5
Comments: The section references is missing.
c) categories: is the entry categorized in a correct way? (Which categories are missing?)
Rating: 5
Comments: The section references is missing.
8.Illustrated
a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
Rating: 0
Comments: There are no illustrations.
b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Rating: /
Comments: There are no illustrations
9. Length
Rating: 6
Comments: It is a bit a short text
