Talk:Post-structuralism

Revision as of 08:56, 24 October 2012 by MarliseHoekstra (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

1. Relevance: 10-10 The post-structuralism is one of the main topics of the Spatial Action course. Therefore it is very relevant.

2 a. Well Written: 8-10 Spelling and grammar are correct.

2 b. Comprehensive: 8-10 There is an appropriate use of jargon and the content is very clear through the use of sentences.

3 a. Well researched: 7-10 The upper reference is not complete but the sources are diverse although not many are used.

3 b. in-line citations: 8-10 The inline citations are good. Some are quotes and some are taken over in the own words.

4 a. Main Aspects: 9-10 All the important thinkers and theories are mentioned.

4 b. focused: 10-10 All the details are useful.

5 Neutral: 10-10 There is no personal opinion in this text.

6. Stable: 10-10 No edit war found...

7.a. Lead: 8-10 The lead is well written and gives an overview but is not really separated from the text.

7 b. Structure: 6-10 The structure is quit clear, but there is no table of content and no hierarchical section.

7 c. Categories: 5-10 No categorization.

8 a. Illustrated: No rating: It was not possible to put in pictures trough out the course.

8 b. Relevant: No rating...

9. Length: 9-10 Very well focused on the topic, could have a little more detail in it.