Talk:Language

From Geography

Revision as of 13:54, 25 October 2012 by StefTomesen (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient)

1. Relevance: 7/10: The relevance of the subject is mentioned in the text: “language is used as central medium for action and meaning transfer”.

2. Well-written: 7/10: It can be seen as three seperated entries. It’s very clear that three writers have written the seperated texts, but each one is well written.

3. well-researched: 7/10: The writers used many sources to get their information. The subject is approached in multiple ways. I think there could be said more about the subject. Maybe the link with Ludwig Wittgenstein could be mentioned.

4. Broad in its coverage: 7/10: see 3.

5. Neutral: 8/10:..

6. Stable: 8/10:. The entrie does not make a turn

7. Well-structured: 7/10: The structure of the entrie should be mentioned in the first part. The part about structuralism is completely unexpected, but a good complemention.

8. Illustrated: -/10:. There are no illustrations.

9. Length: 7/10: -

Personal tools