Talk:Time geography

From Geography

Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient) 1. Relevance: It is relevant for this course. Rating: 8/10 (0-10) Comments: The page Time geography is relevant to the course. Hagerstrand who is key geographer in the course introduced the theory.

2. Well-written: a) well-written: its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard; the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; Rating: 7/10 (0-10) Comments: The page is well written, grammar and spelling are used correctly.

b) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context. Rating: 8/10 (0-10) Comments: The subject is described very clear and examples are given. The model is explained and the constraints, also critics on the theory are given.

3. well-researched: Factually accurate and verifiable: a) it provides references to all sources of information following the APA guidelines; Rating: 7 (1-10) Comments: The sources are according to the APA quidelines. Only two sources are mentioned. In the text is sometimes referred to the sources.

4. Broad in its coverage: a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; Rating: 8 (0-10) Comments: The concept is explained well and the different constraints are better explained on separate wikipedia pages with links.

b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. Rating: 7 (0-10) Comments: The text is clear, no unnecessary information is given.

5. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each. Rating: 8 (0-10) Comments: The page is neutral, the critique given is very good and also shows negative sides of the theory.

6. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Rating: 8 (0-10) Comments: The page is edited a few times , but this can have positive effects as well, because this improves the page.

7. Well-structured: a) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; rating: 8 (0-10) Comments: The page is well structured, it starts of with a lead and a table of content and the different paragraphs.

b) appropriate structure: a system of hierarchical section headings and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents. Rating: 8 (0-10) Comments: The table of content is clear and the page is well structured.

c) categories: is the entry categorized in a correct way? Rating: - (0-10) Comments: The page is not categorized.

8. Illustrated: if possible, by images, maps, schematic overviews: a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; Rating: - (0-10) Comments: There’re are no images on the page, an image of the contains could make the content clearer.

9. Length: It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style. Rating: 8 (0-10) Comments: The length is fine and the text is written in summary style.

evaluated by Mathijs Lammers