Talk:Regionalisation
From Geography
Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient)
1. Relevance: 8/10: The relevance of this page for the course spatial action is high. The concept regionalization can be used to structure the social reality and the space that is linked to it.
2. Well-written: 8/10: The page is mostly well-written, the writers have used correct English, but there are some small spelling mistakes (for example regionalisation or regionalization. Further they used a professional standard. All the important elements of regionalization are appointed in the text and the subject is placed in the right context.
3. well-researched: 5/10: The research that's done for the page is okay, but the application of the APA guidelines is incomplete and not structurally. The used different scientific well-written sources for the text. But in some pieces of the text they refer to this source and in other parts not. In the text there is only a reference to 'Werlen' and under the headline 'References' there stands also the sources: 'Aitken and Craib'. Besides is the full description of the references incomplete.
4. Broad in its coverage: 7/10: The page addresses the main aspects of the topic. There is attention for the main aspects and there are examples to explain the abstract stuff. Besides the page stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. The only topic they could maybe give more attention to is to the person Benno Werlen.
5. Neutral: 9/10: The text is written neutral. There is no criticizing performed by the authors.
6. Stable: 7/10: The page is pretty stable, the page is over time enhanced by four people, who did mainly new additions to the page and leave the existing text alone.
7. Well-structured: 8/10: The page is well structured. There are clear sections of the different topics in the text. There is only missing a link to the page (Benno Werlen) on the wiki.
8. Illustrated: 6/10: The illustration is unclear. In the illustration where the modes of regionalization is visualized, you see terms that do not show up in the text. So the illustration is now difficult to understand in relation to the text.
9. Length: 9/10: The length of the page is good, all the aspects of regionalization are explained and examples are given.
Page evaluated by --LarsPaardekooper 15:44, 23 October 2012 (CEST)
