Talk:Capability constraints
From Geography
1. Relevance: It is relevant for this course. Rating: 7
Comments: It is relevant for this course as you can use it for as a background information. It is a specific part
2. Well-written:
a) well-written: its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard; the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct;
Rating: 7
Comments: Spelling and grammar are correct.
b) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context.
Rating: 7
Comments: It is clear and to the point.
3. well-researched: Factually accurate and verifiable:
a) it provides references to all sources of information following the APA guidelines;
Rating: 8
Comments: References in the text and in the list of literature is present.
b) it provides in-line citations (including page numbers) from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the APA guidelines.
Rating: 8
Comments: There are no literal citations, but there is reference to the literature. But in my opinion the literature reference is not regarding the APA style.
4. Broad in its coverage:
a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;
Rating: 8
Comments: It does cover the main topic,
b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
Rating: 8
Comments: It stays focused on the topic
5. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each. Rating: 8
Comments: Viewpoints are represented fairly and without bias.
6. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Rating: 7
It has not changed significantly
7. Well-structured:
a) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
Rating: 7
Comments: There is no lead section, but is not really needed as we deal with one topic. But I would have made a separate header for the ‘references’ and ‘contributors’
b) appropriate structure: a system of hierarchical section headings and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents. Rating: 7
See comment at 7a
c) categories: is the entry categorized in a correct way? (Which categories are missing?)
It is not categorized
Rating: 1
8. Illustrated: if possible, by images, maps, schematic overviews:
a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
Rating: not relevant
Comments: There are no images.
b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Rating: not relevant
Comments: There are no images.
9. Length: It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style.
Rating: 9
Comments: To the point
Reviewed by--HennyLi 16:26, 26 October 2012 (CEST)
