Talk:Centre

From Geography

Jump to: navigation, search

1. Relevance: It is relevant for this course. Rating: 8/10 (0-10) Comments: Centre is very relevant for the course as well as in geography. This page so is very useful.

2. Well-written: a) well-written: Rating: 7/10 (0-10) Comments: The page is well written, grammar and spelling are used correctly.

b) comprehensive: Rating: 4/10 (0-10) Comments: There’s some information missing on this page, the page could be improved and more theory about the subject could be added.

3. well-researched: Factually accurate and verifiable: a) it provides references to all sources of information following the APA guidelines; Rating: 8 (1-10) Comments: The sources are according to the APA guidelines. In the text is referred to the sources, including page numbers so the information is verifiable.

4. Broad in its coverage: a) Rating: 5 (0-10) comments: The main theme is described, but no further information is given, this could be improved.

b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. Rating: 7 (0-10) Comments: The text is clear, no unnecessary information is given.

5. Neutral: : 8 (0-10) Comments: The page is neutral

6. Stable: . Rating: 7 (0-10) Comments: The page is edited a few times, so the text is stable, but the page could be further improved.

7. Well-structured: a) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; rating: 7 (0-10) Comments: The lead is quite long and there’s only one paragraph. But the structure is clear, because the text is not that long

b) appropriate structure: Rating: - (0-10) Comments: No table of content

c) categories: is the entry categorized in a correct way? Rating: - (0-10) Comments: The page is not categorized.

8. Illustrated: if possible, by images, maps, schematic overviews: a) Rating: - (0-10) Comments: There’re are no images on the page.

9. Length: It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style. Rating: 7 (0-10) Comments: The text is written in summary style, no useless details are given.

Evaluated by Mathijs Lammers

Personal tools