Talk:Sense of place
From Geography
1. Relevance: 8 Usefull term in action theory.
2. Well-written a) well-written: 7 easy to read b) comprehensive: 6 subject is clearly explained.
3. well-researched a) it provides references to all sources of information following the APA guidelines: 8 sources are added correctly. b) it provides in-line citations (including page numbers) from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the APA guidelines: 7 Sources are clear, but lots of quotations.
4. Broad in its coverage a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; Rating: 7 subject is explained, it is hard to at more about this subject. b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail: 7 subject is clearly explained, but an example would be nice.
5. Neutral: 10 Text is neutral.
6. Stable: 9 it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
7. Well-structured a) a lead: 6 Starts with a definition of the subject, which is supposed to be a lead, but isn't. b) appropriate structure: 4 Headings not used, which makes this wikipage a text with not good structure. c) categories: 1 Missing
8. Illustrated: 6 No image added but it is not neccesary either. b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: /
9. Length: 8 There is no unneccesary information on this site, so length is fine.
Evaluated by Malou van Woerkum, 16-10-2012
