Being

From Geography

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (8 revisions)
 
(4 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
The term Being is intimately linked to the term [[Dasein]]. Both concepts are part of the philosophy of [[Heidegger]].  
+
The term Being is intimately linked to the term [[Dasein]]. Both concepts are part of the philosophy of [[Heidegger]]. Being[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Being_in_itself], the fact that something ''is'' in reality, can be unlocked with the help of an entity called 'Dasein'. This entity is the human being itself, which "possesses, in the depths of its own sense of 'being-in-the-world', the conceptual materials through which it is possible to glimpse the universal truth of Being and also the more specific truths attached to Being of particular non-Dasein (or non-human) entities" (Cloke et al., 1999, p. 80).  
-
----
+
== References ==
-
'''References:'''
 
Cloke, P., Philo, C. & Sadler, D. (1999). Approaching Human Geography. London: Paul Chapman.
Cloke, P., Philo, C. & Sadler, D. (1999). Approaching Human Geography. London: Paul Chapman.
 +
 +
 +
== Contributors ==
 +
 +
 +
''page created by'' --[[User:JikkeVanTHof|JikkeVanTHof]] 10:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:13, 9 October 2011

The term Being is intimately linked to the term Dasein. Both concepts are part of the philosophy of Heidegger. Being[1], the fact that something is in reality, can be unlocked with the help of an entity called 'Dasein'. This entity is the human being itself, which "possesses, in the depths of its own sense of 'being-in-the-world', the conceptual materials through which it is possible to glimpse the universal truth of Being and also the more specific truths attached to Being of particular non-Dasein (or non-human) entities" (Cloke et al., 1999, p. 80).


References

Cloke, P., Philo, C. & Sadler, D. (1999). Approaching Human Geography. London: Paul Chapman.


Contributors

page created by --JikkeVanTHof 10:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)