Environmental Determinism
From Geography
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | + | Environmental determinism, also known as ''climatic determinism'' or ''geographical determinism'', relies on an approach which implies that individuals are bound by their environmental settings, especially climate. These forms of physical geographies determine human behaviour, defined by stimulus-response [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stimulus-response]. | |
| - | + | The approach argues that causal mechanics for behaviour are to be found in the environment (Mitchell, 2000, p. 17). Therefore, all our behaviour is a result of some environmental determination. Because of this determination, this approach does not leave room for speculations, or in any way other key possiblities then ''stimuli'' that may cause human behaviour. | |
| - | + | ||
| + | == History == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Environmental determinism rose to prominence in the late 19th century and early 20th century, partly through the work of human geographer [[Friedrich Ratzel]]. Ratzel collapsed society into nature through the concept of [[Lebensraum]]. Thus he argued that the concept of state was a natural link between people and environment (Mitchell, 2000, p. 18). | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Critique == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Environmental determinism caused a lot of critique by those who could not agree with the determinating component. Carl Sauer for instance stated in the early 20th century that environmental determinism led to premature generalizations about an area’s culture and did not allow for results based on direct observation or other research. This eventually resulted in a shift from environmental determinism to environmental possibilism (Briney, n.d.). [[Environmental possibilism]] leaves more space for the element of chance. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == References == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Briney, A. (n.d.). ''Environmental Determinism: The Controversal Topic''. | ||
| + | Mitchell, D. (2000). ''Cultural geography: a critical introduction''. Blackwell: Oxford. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:NielsVanLiessum|NielsVanLiessum]] 21:18, 8 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:18, 8 September 2011
Environmental determinism, also known as climatic determinism or geographical determinism, relies on an approach which implies that individuals are bound by their environmental settings, especially climate. These forms of physical geographies determine human behaviour, defined by stimulus-response [1]. The approach argues that causal mechanics for behaviour are to be found in the environment (Mitchell, 2000, p. 17). Therefore, all our behaviour is a result of some environmental determination. Because of this determination, this approach does not leave room for speculations, or in any way other key possiblities then stimuli that may cause human behaviour.
History
Environmental determinism rose to prominence in the late 19th century and early 20th century, partly through the work of human geographer Friedrich Ratzel. Ratzel collapsed society into nature through the concept of Lebensraum. Thus he argued that the concept of state was a natural link between people and environment (Mitchell, 2000, p. 18).
Critique
Environmental determinism caused a lot of critique by those who could not agree with the determinating component. Carl Sauer for instance stated in the early 20th century that environmental determinism led to premature generalizations about an area’s culture and did not allow for results based on direct observation or other research. This eventually resulted in a shift from environmental determinism to environmental possibilism (Briney, n.d.). Environmental possibilism leaves more space for the element of chance.
References
Briney, A. (n.d.). Environmental Determinism: The Controversal Topic. Mitchell, D. (2000). Cultural geography: a critical introduction. Blackwell: Oxford.
--NielsVanLiessum 21:18, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
