Essentialism
From Geography
m (4 revisions) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| - | So, essentialism is the philosophy that for every entity there is a bundle of characteristiscs for him. These characteristics are given to him by nature, it is not that he adopted him, but they are given to him. This vision is exactly the opposite from existentialism, which says entities only can become by adopting. | + | So, essentialism is the philosophy that for every entity there is a bundle of characteristiscs for him. These characteristics are given to him by nature, it is not that he adopted him, but they are given to him. This vision is exactly the opposite from [[existentialism]], which says entities only can become by adopting. |
Essentialism says everything an object needs must be present. If this isn't, it loses its identity, like a heart in the human body. Without a heart you can't call yourself human being. | Essentialism says everything an object needs must be present. If this isn't, it loses its identity, like a heart in the human body. Without a heart you can't call yourself human being. | ||
| + | Essentialism came under scrutiny and criticism in the mid to late 20th century by [[Richard Rorty]]. since then the viewpoint that human nature is eternal and unchangeable has been critized by [[Karl Marx]] and [[Martin Heidegger]] as both were known for their [[existential]] thinking, which opposes essentialism. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
Pollmann T, 1999, De letteren als wetenschap, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press. | Pollmann T, 1999, De letteren als wetenschap, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press. | ||
http://books.google.nl/books?id=_goNHAE81WIC&pg=PA48&lpg=PA48&dq=definitie+van+essentialisme&source=bl&ots=uuXuXEQAoB&sig=9M4tQxdXbcZyZqRQQ217soZSA94&hl=nl&ei=EkO0TJCdDYTrOZbfoJMK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CC0Q6AEwBjgK#v=onepage&q=definitie%20van%20essentialisme&f=false | http://books.google.nl/books?id=_goNHAE81WIC&pg=PA48&lpg=PA48&dq=definitie+van+essentialisme&source=bl&ots=uuXuXEQAoB&sig=9M4tQxdXbcZyZqRQQ217soZSA94&hl=nl&ei=EkO0TJCdDYTrOZbfoJMK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CC0Q6AEwBjgK#v=onepage&q=definitie%20van%20essentialisme&f=false | ||
| + | |||
| + | Zierhofer, W. (2002). Speech acts and space(s): Language pragmatics and the discursive constitution of the social. Environment and Planning,34,1355-1372 | ||
| + | |||
Published by Sonny Joziasse & Benny Jansen & Robbert Vossers | Published by Sonny Joziasse & Benny Jansen & Robbert Vossers | ||
| + | Edited BY:--[[User:SamanthaHazlett|SamanthaHazlett]] 14:41, 20 October 2011 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 12:41, 20 October 2011
The essentialism is an approach in the Human Geography that means that every entity has his own characterics. These characterics makes the entity to what it in essence means. All objects like a car, house, human being, spoon ore an train have characterisics that make the objects to what they are.
Without these essential characterics the object has not the definition that makes the object to what is should be. Also in Human Geography are characteristics that make difference between different people, spaces and time. The difference between people are determined by the biology. All bodies are different what means that different characteristics of the bodies. Without organs there is no human being and without an engine there is no car.
So, essentialism is the philosophy that for every entity there is a bundle of characteristiscs for him. These characteristics are given to him by nature, it is not that he adopted him, but they are given to him. This vision is exactly the opposite from existentialism, which says entities only can become by adopting.
Essentialism says everything an object needs must be present. If this isn't, it loses its identity, like a heart in the human body. Without a heart you can't call yourself human being.
Essentialism came under scrutiny and criticism in the mid to late 20th century by Richard Rorty. since then the viewpoint that human nature is eternal and unchangeable has been critized by Karl Marx and Martin Heidegger as both were known for their existential thinking, which opposes essentialism.
References:
Pollmann T, 1999, De letteren als wetenschap, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press. http://books.google.nl/books?id=_goNHAE81WIC&pg=PA48&lpg=PA48&dq=definitie+van+essentialisme&source=bl&ots=uuXuXEQAoB&sig=9M4tQxdXbcZyZqRQQ217soZSA94&hl=nl&ei=EkO0TJCdDYTrOZbfoJMK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CC0Q6AEwBjgK#v=onepage&q=definitie%20van%20essentialisme&f=false
Zierhofer, W. (2002). Speech acts and space(s): Language pragmatics and the discursive constitution of the social. Environment and Planning,34,1355-1372
Published by Sonny Joziasse & Benny Jansen & Robbert Vossers Edited BY:--SamanthaHazlett 14:41, 20 October 2011 (CEST)
