Similarities between phenomenology and Luhmann's theory of social systems
From Geography
KolarAparna (Talk | contribs) |
KolarAparna (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Sense-making and meaning:''' | '''Sense-making and meaning:''' | ||
Luhmann's theory of social systems views social systems as sense-making systems, which is similar to [[phenomenology]]'s focus on the meaningful experiences of actors. (Arnoldi) Meaning is central to Luhmann's concept of social systems in that it is through meaning that a system makes intellegible its environment. | Luhmann's theory of social systems views social systems as sense-making systems, which is similar to [[phenomenology]]'s focus on the meaningful experiences of actors. (Arnoldi) Meaning is central to Luhmann's concept of social systems in that it is through meaning that a system makes intellegible its environment. | ||
| - | Luhmann uses the notion of Sinn or sense from Phenomenology with notions of self-reference or autopoiesis while drawing on Spencer-Brown's Boolean logic, to come up with the concept of distinction-form | + | Luhmann uses the notion of Sinn or sense from Phenomenology with notions of self-reference or autopoiesis while drawing on Spencer-Brown's Boolean logic, to come up with the concept of distinction-form. In this he says that the foundation of any meaningful experience is the drawing of distinction. Something though a distinction becomes the center of attention. |
'''Horizon:''' | '''Horizon:''' | ||
Revision as of 20:12, 17 October 2011
Sense-making and meaning: Luhmann's theory of social systems views social systems as sense-making systems, which is similar to phenomenology's focus on the meaningful experiences of actors. (Arnoldi) Meaning is central to Luhmann's concept of social systems in that it is through meaning that a system makes intellegible its environment. Luhmann uses the notion of Sinn or sense from Phenomenology with notions of self-reference or autopoiesis while drawing on Spencer-Brown's Boolean logic, to come up with the concept of distinction-form. In this he says that the foundation of any meaningful experience is the drawing of distinction. Something though a distinction becomes the center of attention.
Horizon: with the meaning of horizon Husserl shows that the world can never be fully understood but only through partial views. Luhmann uses this notion of selection to systems which are faced with a high degree of complexity and make sense through selection, while the non-selected remains as a horizon of possibilities.
References
- Arnoldi, J. (). Niklas Luhman an Introduction.
- Arnoldi, J (). Sense making as communication. Soziale Systeme 16 (2010), Heft 1, S. 28-48. Lucius&Lucius. Stuttgart. link: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=12&ved=0CCcQFjABOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.soziale-systeme.ch%2Fpdf%2FSoSy_01_10_Arnoldi_www.pdf&rct=j&q=phenomenology%20and%20luhmann&ei=LYGcTovBEImc-wbPkdiyBQ&usg=AFQjCNERMnfwnmWtg4y7KVEKtvp_o2tYMg&cad=rja viewed on 17/10/2011
Contributors
- page created by Kolar Aparna--KolarAparna 20:30, 17 October 2011 (CEST)
