Tactics
From Geography
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
'''Tactics''' ''Defenition by De Chertau'' | '''Tactics''' ''Defenition by De Chertau'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tactics are to be understand in relation to power and strategy. The gaze of power transfixes objects but also thus becomes blind to a vast array of things that do not fit its categories. Strategic power works by controlling and organising space to construct proper knowledge. In contrast, tactics - the art of space making do, like reading or cooking - use what is there in multiple permutations. In de Certeau's terms they pass without occupying space. (Crang 146-147) | ||
| + | |||
| + | De Chertau says more specified about Tactics: I call a 'Tactic' on the other hand, a calculus which cannot count on a 'proper' (a spatial or institutional localization, nor thus on a borderline distinguishing the other as a visible totality. The place of a tactic belongs to the other.... Because it[a tactic] does not have a place, a tactic depends on time. It is always on the watch for opportunities that must be seized 'on the wing'. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tactics are the weapons of the weak. Many everyday practices (talking, reading, moving about, shopping cooking, etc. are tactical in character. And so are, more generally, many 'ways of operating': victories of the 'weak' over the 'strong'(whether the strength be that of powerful people or the violence of things or of an imposed order, etc), clever tricks, knowing how to get away with things, ‘hunters cunning’, manoeuvres, polymorphic simulations, joyful discoveries, poetic as well as warlike. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''References''' | ||
| + | * Crang, M.(2000. Relics, Places and unwritten geographiees in the work of Michel de Certeau(1925-1986). In: Crang, M. & Trihft, N.(eds) Thingking space. Routledge, London. | ||
| + | * de Certeau, M.(1984) Introduction. In the practice of everyday life. Berkely: university of California press. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Harmen|Harmen]] 13:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:27, 29 September 2010
Tactics Defenition by De Chertau
Tactics are to be understand in relation to power and strategy. The gaze of power transfixes objects but also thus becomes blind to a vast array of things that do not fit its categories. Strategic power works by controlling and organising space to construct proper knowledge. In contrast, tactics - the art of space making do, like reading or cooking - use what is there in multiple permutations. In de Certeau's terms they pass without occupying space. (Crang 146-147)
De Chertau says more specified about Tactics: I call a 'Tactic' on the other hand, a calculus which cannot count on a 'proper' (a spatial or institutional localization, nor thus on a borderline distinguishing the other as a visible totality. The place of a tactic belongs to the other.... Because it[a tactic] does not have a place, a tactic depends on time. It is always on the watch for opportunities that must be seized 'on the wing'.
Tactics are the weapons of the weak. Many everyday practices (talking, reading, moving about, shopping cooking, etc. are tactical in character. And so are, more generally, many 'ways of operating': victories of the 'weak' over the 'strong'(whether the strength be that of powerful people or the violence of things or of an imposed order, etc), clever tricks, knowing how to get away with things, ‘hunters cunning’, manoeuvres, polymorphic simulations, joyful discoveries, poetic as well as warlike.
References
- Crang, M.(2000. Relics, Places and unwritten geographiees in the work of Michel de Certeau(1925-1986). In: Crang, M. & Trihft, N.(eds) Thingking space. Routledge, London.
- de Certeau, M.(1984) Introduction. In the practice of everyday life. Berkely: university of California press.
--Harmen 13:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
