Talk:Marwyn Samuels

From Geography

1. Relevance: It is relevant for this course.

Rating: (4)

Comments: In my opinion this entry dus not give very much important information on the subject of Spatial Action.

2. Well-written:

a) well-written: its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard; the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct;

Rating: (8)

Comments: There are important mistakes in the buildup of the sentences.

b) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context. Rating: 8

Comments: Most of the important information about the subject is represented in the text.

3. well-researched: Factually accurate and verifiable: a) it provides references to all sources of information following the APA guidelines; Rating: (10)

Comments: none

b) it provides in-line citations (including page numbers) from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the APA guidelines.

Rating: (10)

Comments: none

4. Broad in its coverage: a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; Rating: (9)

Comments: It gives a good representation of the available information.

b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. Rating: 9 Comments: When neccesary the writer refers to other pages.

5. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each. Rating: 10 Comments: no subjective remarks are made.

6. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Rating: 10 Comments: It has been written over the span of a few days.

7. Well-structured: a) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; Rating: 8 Comments: the life-path of the person serves as introduction.

b) appropriate structure: a system of hierarchical section headings and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents. Rating: none Comments: There is no table of contents

c) categories: is the entry categorized in a correct way? (Which categories are missing?) Rating: 4 Comments: The category is to broad.

8. Illustrated: if possible, by images, maps, schematic overviews: a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; Rating: none Comments: There are no pictures

b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Rating: none Comments: There are no pictures

9. Length: It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style. Rating: 8 Comments: Te length is good, though it could be shortened a little bit.

SimonTjoonk 16:12, 26 October 2012 (CEST)