Talk:Émile Durkheim

From Geography

Revision as of 16:46, 23 October 2012 by MarleenRevenberg (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient)


1. Relevance: 8: Émile Durkheim is very relevant to the course of Spatial Action. He plays a very important role in this course as one of the most important social scientists and a late-modernist.

2. Well-written: 8: The page is well written, there are no grammatical faults and the writing is of a professional standard. It is placed in it's context late-modernity.

3. Well-researched: 7: There are 4 sources used following the APA guidelines. One of them, Appelrouth, is in the list of references, but that source is not used in the text. So that's a point of critique.

4. Broad in its coverage: 9: The page addresses the main aspects of the work and theory of Émile Durkheim. First a biography part is written and after that the page consists a part with his theory. The page stays focused on the topic and there are no unnecessary details on it.

5. Neutral: 8: The page is written neutral, without giving weight to something. The authors don't criticeze the views of Émile Durkheim and his work.

6. Stable: 8: The page is stable, and has been edited 3 times since it has been published.

7. Well-structured: 9: The page is structured very well. First a overview about what headings are comimg. Then an overview of the biography and after that a paragraph about his work. Further, the page is categorized within the late-modernity category.

8. Illustrated: -: No illustration.

9. Length: 8: The length of the page is good. It stays focused on the main topic and there are no unnecessary details.


Evaluated by Marleen Revenberg, 23 October 2012

Personal tools