Talk:Centre
From Geography
1. Relevance: It is relevant for this course. Rating: 8/10 (0-10) Comments: Centre is very relevant for the course as well as in geography. This page so is very useful.
2. Well-written: a) well-written: Rating: 7/10 (0-10) Comments: The page is well written, grammar and spelling are used correctly.
b) comprehensive: Rating: 4/10 (0-10) Comments: There’s some information missing on this page, the page could be improved and more theory about the subject could be added.
3. well-researched: Factually accurate and verifiable: a) it provides references to all sources of information following the APA guidelines; Rating: 8 (1-10) Comments: The sources are according to the APA guidelines. In the text is referred to the sources, including page numbers so the information is verifiable.
4. Broad in its coverage: a) Rating: 5 (0-10) comments: The main theme is described, but no further information is given, this could be improved.
b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. Rating: 7 (0-10) Comments: The text is clear, no unnecessary information is given.
5. Neutral: : 8 (0-10) Comments: The page is neutral
6. Stable: . Rating: 7 (0-10) Comments: The page is edited a few times, so the text is stable, but the page could be further improved.
7. Well-structured: a) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; rating: 7 (0-10) Comments: The lead is quite long and there’s only one paragraph. But the structure is clear, because the text is not that long
b) appropriate structure: Rating: - (0-10) Comments: No table of content
c) categories: is the entry categorized in a correct way? Rating: - (0-10) Comments: The page is not categorized.
8. Illustrated: if possible, by images, maps, schematic overviews: a) Rating: - (0-10) Comments: There’re are no images on the page.
9. Length: It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style. Rating: 7 (0-10) Comments: The text is written in summary style, no useless details are given.
Evaluated by Mathijs Lammers
