Talk:Chorology

From Geography

Revision as of 18:24, 25 October 2012 by StefTomesen (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

1. Relevance: 7/10: It is relevant for the course, it is an important part of the spatial analysis approach.

2. Well-written: 8/10: The entrie has a good structure. It starts with a general story about the term. In the end, the term will be split into two ´sub-terms'

3. Well-researched: 8/10: The writer shows that he has enough knowlegde of the subject. He mentions the right researchers.

4. Broad in its coverage: 7/10: I think that important aspect of the term is been explained. Maybe the term 'Länderskunde' could be mentioned. 5. Neutral: 9/10: The writer does not show his opinion about the subject.

6. Stable: 9/10:

7. Well-structured: 6/10: see 2.

8. Illustrated: -/10: There are no illustrations and images

9. Length: 8/10: Everything the writer has to know has been described. It is short but it does not have to be a longer story.

Personal tools