Talk:Sense of community

From Geography

Revision as of 08:25, 23 October 2012 by RenateVanHaaren (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

1. Relevance: 7. Of course it's relevant for our course, because it's one of the concepts explained in the given literature. It's not of the most important concepts though, because it's just a part of it.

2. Well-written: 6,5. a) In general the text is clear, summarizing and it's understandible. The word 'sense' is not correct written, since it is written as 'sence'.

b) 8. It explains well what the concept means and keeps to the core.It's just not quite clear to what subject it belongs, because the given literature isn't used and it's not explained to what stream it belongs.

3. well-researched: Factually accurate and verifiable: 9. It does follow the APA guidelines.

b) It doesn't contain any citations.

4. Broad in its coverage: a). 7. It does addresses the main aspects of the topic, because you understand what's the concept all about. It's just not clear where the concept belongs to.

b). 8. It stays focused on the topic withou going into unnecessary detail because it handles the 4 steps/elements of the topic. In the end there's a conclusion.

5. 10. It is indeed neutral, because there's no individual meaning given.

6. Stable: 8. In general this concept doesn't change with the wind. It's a concept which is there no matter what war or change in the society. It's possible that the example given changes, but this chance is small and takes a long time (not just a few days for example).

7. Well-structured: a) 5. It just jumps into the topic, without introducing it. It starts directly with the explanation that there are 2 ways in which the topic can be used.

b). 6. It is structural written, but this is not clear in one view.

c). There are not categories.

8. Illustrated: This work doesn't contain any illustrations.

9. Length: 10. It is short, but stays indeed directly to the topic. This makes it clear, but it would be nice if more examples were given or it would be explained to which stream or topic this concept belongs.

Page evaluated by Renate van Haaren, --RenateVanHaaren 10:25, 23 October 2012 (CEST)

Personal tools