Talk:Torsten Hägerstrand

From Geography

Revision as of 17:20, 23 October 2012 by MarleenRevenberg (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Rating (from 0-10, 10 being the highest, and 6 being just sufficient)

1. Relevance: 7: The relevance of this page for the course spatial action is high because Hägerstrand is important in the time geography which is important in the course Spatial Action.

2. Well-written: 8: The page is mostly well-written, the writers have used correct English. Further there is used a heading to explain the main topic time geography, which makes the page very clear.

3. well-researched: 8: The research is done OK. But the application of the APA guidlines is incomplete. In references is the source Haggerty included, but in the text there is no reference to that source. The other sources are following the APA guidelines correctly.

4. Broad in its coverage: 8: It is focused and to the point, and very clear that there used different headings. The main concepts of the time geography are explained very briefly.

5. Neutral: 9: The text is written neutral. There is no criticizing performed by the authors.

6. Stable: 7: The page is stable, and only enhanced by one people. This means that the page was complete from the beginning.

7. Well-structured: 8: The page is very well structured because of the hierarchial system of headings. That makes it very clear. Only there are missing some links: a link to the different constraints.

8. Illustrated: -: No illustration included.

9. Length: 9: The length of the page is good, it stays to the point, which makes it easy to read.


Evaluated by Marleen Revenberg, 23 October 2012

Personal tools