The missing symmetry of constructionism
From Geography
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "The constructivism is a flow, which thinks that the most (probably all) phenomena in reality are socially constructed. The problem with this thought is that there is nog symmetry...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | The | + | The [[constructionism]] is a flow, which thinks that the most (probably all) [[phenomena]] in [[reality]] are socially constructed. The problem with this thought is that there is nog symmetry between different angles. Constructionists believe that the phenomena, like [[space]], in reality are socially constructed. But they don’t have any interest in the opposite question of the influence of spatial effects on the social construction(Koch, 2005). |
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 13:50, 31 December 2012
The constructionism is a flow, which thinks that the most (probably all) phenomena in reality are socially constructed. The problem with this thought is that there is nog symmetry between different angles. Constructionists believe that the phenomena, like space, in reality are socially constructed. But they don’t have any interest in the opposite question of the influence of spatial effects on the social construction(Koch, 2005).
References
Koch, A. (2005), Autopoietic spatial systems: the significance of actor network theory and system theory for the development of a system theoretical approach of space, University of Munich: Germany.
Contributors
--MaikVanDeVeen 14:49, 31 December 2012 (CET)
