Contextual regional geography
From Geography
| (8 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Contextual regional geography (everyday regional geography) is the answer to the deficiencies of [[compositional regional geography]] (traditional regional geography). Important contributors to this form of geography are, among others, [[Anthony Giddens]] and [[Nigel Thrift]]. Contextual regional geography is intimately related to the theory of structuration ([[structuralism]])and the research related to this kind of geography would distinguish two components, namely '[[locale]]' and '[[social action]]'. | Contextual regional geography (everyday regional geography) is the answer to the deficiencies of [[compositional regional geography]] (traditional regional geography). Important contributors to this form of geography are, among others, [[Anthony Giddens]] and [[Nigel Thrift]]. Contextual regional geography is intimately related to the theory of structuration ([[structuralism]])and the research related to this kind of geography would distinguish two components, namely '[[locale]]' and '[[social action]]'. | ||
| - | Thrift aims to take the postmodern conditions into account when looked at the contextual regional geography (Werlen, 2009, p.3). There is a focus upon the human agency. According to Thrift the regional is a "Contextual aspect of social practices". | + | Thrift aims to take the postmodern conditions into account when looked at the contextual regional geography (Werlen, 2009, p.3). There is a focus upon the human agency. According to Thrift the regional is a "Contextual aspect of social practices". This means that the way these practices come together within a regional context, determine the distinctive character of that region (Werlen, 2009). |
== Steps to be taken == | == Steps to be taken == | ||
| - | Two steps should be taken to 'translate' traditional regional geography into a new (everyday) regional geography. | + | Yhrift's approach is justified by the assumption that a transfer of social theory into human geography is impossible without revising the definition of the relationschip between human geography and social science (Werlen, 2009, p.3.Two steps should be taken to 'translate' traditional regional geography into a new (everyday) regional geography. |
'''First step: Redefining the regional''' | '''First step: Redefining the regional''' | ||
| - | At first, it is important not to eliminate the elemental perspective of traditional geography, but to reorientate it. This means that "action-related differentiations and emancipatory standards are to be introduced into this physically defined space" (Werlen, 2009, p.4). So "the region is certainly regarded as a physically defined space within which social action takes place, but not solely in the sense of being an empty, meaningless environment. On the contrary, the region here is given a constitutive meaning - constitutive for human action"(p.4). This means that the region is an indirectly active entity. | + | At first, it is important not to eliminate the elemental perspective of traditional geography, but to reorientate it. This means that "action-related differentiations and emancipatory standards are to be introduced into this physically defined space" (Werlen, 2009, p.4). So "the region is certainly regarded as a physically defined space within which social action takes place, but not solely in the sense of being an empty, meaningless environment. On the contrary, the region here is given a constitutive meaning - constitutive for human action"(p.4). This means that the region is an indirectly active entity. |
'''Second step: From a compositional to a contextual geography''' | '''Second step: From a compositional to a contextual geography''' | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
4.[[Conflict and capacity]] | 4.[[Conflict and capacity]] | ||
| - | |||
== Critique == | == Critique == | ||
| - | In the Contextual regional geography Thrift is spatializing the social. The theory concentrates on human action, but still uses space as most important object of research. "Contextual geography with a space-centered research perspective is and stays a contradiction because, logically, there cannot be a spatially defined context prior to human praxis." In stead of focussing on the subject (people) it should focus on the acting of these subjects. "We need a change from ‘regional geography’ to the geographical exploration of ‘[[everyday regionalization]]’ processes.(Werlen, 2009, p. 292-293) " | + | In the Contextual regional geography Thrift is spatializing the social. The theory concentrates on human action, but still uses space as most important object of research. "Contextual geography with a space-centered research perspective is and stays a contradiction because, logically, there cannot be a spatially defined context prior to human praxis." In stead of focussing on the subject (people) it should focus on the acting of these subjects. Trift fails to resist the tendency to spatialize the nonspatial (Werlen, 2009, p.8). A contextual geography can't have a space centered research because, there can't be a spatially defined context prior to human [[praxis]]. "We need a change from ‘regional geography’ to the geographical exploration of ‘[[Everyday regionalisation|everyday regionalization]]’ processes.(Werlen, 2009, p. 292-293) " |
| - | + | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
| Line 30: | Line 28: | ||
== Contributors == | == Contributors == | ||
| - | Page created by --[[User:JikkeVanTHof|JikkeVanTHof]] 11:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC) | + | * Page created by --[[User:JikkeVanTHof|JikkeVanTHof]] 11:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | * ''Page enhanced by Aafke Brus'' --[[User:AafkeBrus|AafkeBrus]] 15:51, 24 October 2011 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Page edited by--[[User:HuubVanDerZwaluw|HuubVanDerZwaluw]] 19:16, 23 September 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Page edited by --[[User:HennyLi|HennyLi]] 21:06, 10 October 2012 (CEST) | ||
| - | + | * Page edited by Pieter van Luijk 21 October 2012 | |
| - | + | ||
Latest revision as of 21:04, 21 October 2012
Contextual regional geography (everyday regional geography) is the answer to the deficiencies of compositional regional geography (traditional regional geography). Important contributors to this form of geography are, among others, Anthony Giddens and Nigel Thrift. Contextual regional geography is intimately related to the theory of structuration (structuralism)and the research related to this kind of geography would distinguish two components, namely 'locale' and 'social action'.
Thrift aims to take the postmodern conditions into account when looked at the contextual regional geography (Werlen, 2009, p.3). There is a focus upon the human agency. According to Thrift the regional is a "Contextual aspect of social practices". This means that the way these practices come together within a regional context, determine the distinctive character of that region (Werlen, 2009).
Contents |
Steps to be taken
Yhrift's approach is justified by the assumption that a transfer of social theory into human geography is impossible without revising the definition of the relationschip between human geography and social science (Werlen, 2009, p.3.Two steps should be taken to 'translate' traditional regional geography into a new (everyday) regional geography.
First step: Redefining the regional At first, it is important not to eliminate the elemental perspective of traditional geography, but to reorientate it. This means that "action-related differentiations and emancipatory standards are to be introduced into this physically defined space" (Werlen, 2009, p.4). So "the region is certainly regarded as a physically defined space within which social action takes place, but not solely in the sense of being an empty, meaningless environment. On the contrary, the region here is given a constitutive meaning - constitutive for human action"(p.4). This means that the region is an indirectly active entity.
Second step: From a compositional to a contextual geography Second, we can come to a real 'translation' to contextual regional geography by looking at the 'locale' and 'social action'. "Locales can be characterized as particular time-space patterns or structures having a determining impact on life-paths" (Werlen, 2009, p.5). In this way it elaborates categories of Time geography. 'Social action', next to that, identifies four aspects:
1.Personality and socialisation
2.Penetration and the availability of knowledge
Critique
In the Contextual regional geography Thrift is spatializing the social. The theory concentrates on human action, but still uses space as most important object of research. "Contextual geography with a space-centered research perspective is and stays a contradiction because, logically, there cannot be a spatially defined context prior to human praxis." In stead of focussing on the subject (people) it should focus on the acting of these subjects. Trift fails to resist the tendency to spatialize the nonspatial (Werlen, 2009, p.8). A contextual geography can't have a space centered research because, there can't be a spatially defined context prior to human praxis. "We need a change from ‘regional geography’ to the geographical exploration of ‘everyday regionalization’ processes.(Werlen, 2009, p. 292-293) "
References
Werlen, B. (2009). Everyday Regionalizations. In: International Encyclopedia for Human Geography. Elsevier.
Contributors
- Page created by --JikkeVanTHof 11:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- Page enhanced by Aafke Brus --AafkeBrus 15:51, 24 October 2011 (CEST)
- Page edited by--HuubVanDerZwaluw 19:16, 23 September 2012 (CEST)
- Page edited by --HennyLi 21:06, 10 October 2012 (CEST)
- Page edited by Pieter van Luijk 21 October 2012
