Space according to Zierhofer
From Geography
(Created page with "According to Zierhofer space can be described as “the scheme of interpretation that is used to ascribe attributes of any kind to entities of any kind” (Zierhofer, 2002, p...") |
SimonTjoonk (Talk | contribs) m |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | According to [[Zierhofer]] space can be described as “the scheme of interpretation that is used to ascribe attributes of any kind to entities of any kind” (Zierhofer, 2002, p. 1368). Several other authors such as [[Klüter]], [[Reichert]], [[Weichhart]] and [[Benno Werlen|Werlen]] have also argued a case for space as a scheme of interpretation. However unlike them, [[Zierhofer]] considers space not to be solely a locational framework because the distinction between the physical (matter) and the non-physical (mind) is conditional. Space should not be seen as an object for an actor, but rather as an instrument for the observer with which he may constitute objects (Zierhofer, 2002). | + | According to [[Wolfgang Zierhofer|Zierhofer]] space can be described as “the scheme of interpretation that is used to ascribe attributes of any kind to entities of any kind” (Zierhofer, 2002, p. 1368). Several other authors such as [[Klüter]], [[Reichert]], [[Weichhart]] and [[Benno Werlen|Werlen]] have also argued a case for space as a scheme of interpretation. However unlike them, [[Wolfgang Zierhofer|Zierhofer]] considers space not to be solely a locational framework because the distinction between the physical (matter) and the non-physical (mind) is conditional. Space should not be seen as an object for an actor, but rather as an instrument for the observer with which he may constitute objects (Zierhofer, 2002). |
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
- [[First order space|First order space]] is concerned with the making of distinctions. These can be named, measured, calculated and spoken about. | - [[First order space|First order space]] is concerned with the making of distinctions. These can be named, measured, calculated and spoken about. | ||
| - | - [[ | + | - [[Second order space]] is concerned with time. |
| + | |||
| + | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
| - | Zierhofer, W. (2002) Speech Acts and Spaces. Manuscript. | + | |
| + | * Zierhofer, W. (2002). Speech Acts and Spaces. Manuscript. ''Environment and Planning A., 34''. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
== Contributors == | == Contributors == | ||
| - | + | ||
| + | * ''Page published by Robbert Wilmink --[[User:RobbertWilmink|RobbertWilmink]] 20:50, 12 October 2011 (CEST)'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * ''Page added to Category 'Language Pragmatic Action Theory' by Iris van der Wal - 11:18, October 26th 2012'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category: Language Pragmatic Action Theory]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:54, 26 October 2012
According to Zierhofer space can be described as “the scheme of interpretation that is used to ascribe attributes of any kind to entities of any kind” (Zierhofer, 2002, p. 1368). Several other authors such as Klüter, Reichert, Weichhart and Werlen have also argued a case for space as a scheme of interpretation. However unlike them, Zierhofer considers space not to be solely a locational framework because the distinction between the physical (matter) and the non-physical (mind) is conditional. Space should not be seen as an object for an actor, but rather as an instrument for the observer with which he may constitute objects (Zierhofer, 2002).
Zierhofer distinguishes between two orders of space:
- First order space is concerned with the making of distinctions. These can be named, measured, calculated and spoken about.
- Second order space is concerned with time.
References
- Zierhofer, W. (2002). Speech Acts and Spaces. Manuscript. Environment and Planning A., 34.
Contributors
- Page published by Robbert Wilmink --RobbertWilmink 20:50, 12 October 2011 (CEST)
- Page added to Category 'Language Pragmatic Action Theory' by Iris van der Wal - 11:18, October 26th 2012
