Luhmann's theory of society

From Geography

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(8 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
Regarding this theory (Gren & Zierhoffer, 2002) the modern society has been divided into serveral [[subsystem]].  These subsystems operates on the base of [[functional differentiation]]. Each subsystem has an internal code which is often based on binary distinction. With the binary code it is possible to see the main distinction on which a subssytem works on.  Furthermore, a subssystem consists of a program, operation and medium.
+
===Definition===
-
Programs set the context of the application of the code. Programs open the system to the world and they establish links between the various specialised subsystems. However, programs can change over the time, while codes are quite stable. Both programs and codes sets the possibility of observation of a system.    
+
This theory is developed by [[Niklas Luhmann]]. Regarding this theory (Gren & Zierhoffer, 2003) the modern society has been divided into serveral functionally specialised [[subsystem]]s. These subsystems cannot be replaced by the other subsystems and they exist seperated from each other. A consequense within modern societies is that there is no metaposition. There is no position which is representative for the whole society. A metaposition would give somebody the opportunity to observe a whole society or speak for a whole society. Within Luhmann's theory of society the aspect of [[functional differentiation]] plays a important role. The capacity of a society to deal and to solve its problems depends on the it. All problems need to be split and translated into issues that a certain system can handle. For example: the subsystem of Economy. This susbsystem can only deal and tackle problems as it is translated to its binary code (having money or not having money, economics benefit or economic costs). If not, the system will see these problems as 'noise' and they will be refained from such operations. On the other hand the [[functional differentiation]] does not determine the subsystems of a society to a rigide and static existence. On the contrary, the programs and codes are dynamic. They can be replaced by new ones. New systems can differentiate themselves while other systems may merge.
-
Operation is the communication process within the sub system. This is the autopoietic process, the ulitmate communication which sets the system. 
+
===Ecological communication===
-
With medium it is meant the way of communication used in an operation within a subssytem. For example in the subssystem Economy, money is the medium of communication within the operation Payment.  
+
The work of Niklas Luhmann Ecological Communication (1989) is one example of his work in withs he uses his theory of society. In Ecological Communication (1989) Luhmann tries to analyse the prospect of solving environmental problems within society. Again and again his analysis reveals a similar result: all subsystems of society are able to deal with problems of their environment insofar as these problems can be selected by the specific programs and submitted to the specific codes of a subsystem (Gren & Zierhoffer, 2003). So a society is dependend on his the capacity of its functional differenttiation.
-
Functional differentiation within theory of society
 
-
Within Luhmann's theory of society the aspect of functional differentiation plays a important role. The capacity of a society to deal and to solve its problems depends on the functional differentiation. Within the society there is no position which is representative for the whole society. All problems need to be split and translated into issues that a certain system can handle. For example: within the subsystem of Economy, this susbsystem can only deal and tackle problems as it is translated to its binary code (having money or not having money, economics benefit or economic costs). If not, the system will see these problems as 'noise' and they will be refained from such operations. On the other hand the functional diffferentiation does not determine the subsystems of a society to a rigide and static existence. On the contrary, the programs and codes are dynamic. They can be replaced by new ones. New systems can differentiate themselves while other systems may merge.
 
-
 
===References===
===References===
Line 17: Line 14:
* Page created by--[[User:HennyLi|HennyLi]] 17:18, 20 October 2012 (CEST)
* Page created by--[[User:HennyLi|HennyLi]] 17:18, 20 October 2012 (CEST)
 +
* Page edited by--[[User:HennyLi|HennyLi]] 18:20, 21 October 2012 (CEST)
 +
* Page edited by Pieter van Luijk 24 October 2012

Latest revision as of 01:13, 25 October 2012

Contents

Definition

This theory is developed by Niklas Luhmann. Regarding this theory (Gren & Zierhoffer, 2003) the modern society has been divided into serveral functionally specialised subsystems. These subsystems cannot be replaced by the other subsystems and they exist seperated from each other. A consequense within modern societies is that there is no metaposition. There is no position which is representative for the whole society. A metaposition would give somebody the opportunity to observe a whole society or speak for a whole society. Within Luhmann's theory of society the aspect of functional differentiation plays a important role. The capacity of a society to deal and to solve its problems depends on the it. All problems need to be split and translated into issues that a certain system can handle. For example: the subsystem of Economy. This susbsystem can only deal and tackle problems as it is translated to its binary code (having money or not having money, economics benefit or economic costs). If not, the system will see these problems as 'noise' and they will be refained from such operations. On the other hand the functional differentiation does not determine the subsystems of a society to a rigide and static existence. On the contrary, the programs and codes are dynamic. They can be replaced by new ones. New systems can differentiate themselves while other systems may merge.

Ecological communication

The work of Niklas Luhmann Ecological Communication (1989) is one example of his work in withs he uses his theory of society. In Ecological Communication (1989) Luhmann tries to analyse the prospect of solving environmental problems within society. Again and again his analysis reveals a similar result: all subsystems of society are able to deal with problems of their environment insofar as these problems can be selected by the specific programs and submitted to the specific codes of a subsystem (Gren & Zierhoffer, 2003). So a society is dependend on his the capacity of its functional differenttiation.

References

  • Gren, M. & Zierhofer, W. (2003). The unity of difference: a critical appraisal of Niklas Luhmann's theory of social system in the context of corperaity and spatiality. In: Environment & Planning A. Vol. 35. pp. 615-630.

Contributors

  • Page created by--HennyLi 17:18, 20 October 2012 (CEST)
  • Page edited by--HennyLi 18:20, 21 October 2012 (CEST)
  • Page edited by Pieter van Luijk 24 October 2012
Personal tools