First order space
From Geography
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | First order space is 'created' by Zierhofer. He made a distinction in space, he devided space in 'first order space' and 'second order space' | + | First order space is 'created' by [[Wolfgang Zierhofer|Zierhofer]]. He made a distinction in space, he devided space in 'first order space' and '[[second order space]]'. Zierhofer describes the differences between first and secord order space as follows: "The benefit of this distinction between first and second order spaces is to combine a notion of space as fundamental epistemic category, on the one hand, with the infinite empirical richness of particular object-spaces and locational schemes, on the other hand" (Zierhofer, 2005, p. 32). When we add time to space, we enter the [[second order space]]. |
| - | "The benefit of this distinction between first and second order spaces is to combine a notion of space as fundamental epistemic category, on the one hand, with the infinite empirical richness of particular object-spaces and locational schemes, on the other hand | + | |
| - | Important is "to realize that the function and value of a universal epistemic category rests in the possibility to be applied to contents of any kind, but that this does not imply a claim of universal validity. Only an interpretation of first order space as a contingent cognitive tool – a distinction produced and used in a certain communicative context – would be compatible with a non-representational approach | + | Important is "to realize that the function and value of a universal epistemic category rests in the possibility to be applied to contents of any kind, but that this does not imply a claim of universal validity. Only an interpretation of first order space as a contingent cognitive tool – a distinction produced and used in a certain communicative context – would be compatible with a non-representational approach" (Zierhofer, 2005, p. 32). |
The first order space as Zierhofer says it: "is nothing but the bare possibility to draw one or more distinctions." (2002, p. 1369) To make these distinctions we need to have underlying terms or codes to make sure we ''can'' make this distinction. For example: here/there, Yes/No and we need an amount of units to make it possible to rank these units. | The first order space as Zierhofer says it: "is nothing but the bare possibility to draw one or more distinctions." (2002, p. 1369) To make these distinctions we need to have underlying terms or codes to make sure we ''can'' make this distinction. For example: here/there, Yes/No and we need an amount of units to make it possible to rank these units. | ||
| - | |||
| Line 17: | Line 15: | ||
'''References:''' | '''References:''' | ||
| - | Zierhofer, W. (2002). Speech acts and space(s): Language pragmatics and the discursive constitution of the social. Environment and Planning,34,1355-1372. Retrieved on 10 October 2010, from http://blackboard.ru.nl/bbcswebdav/courses/ABBW-BCU255A-01-2010/Zierhofer(2002).pdf | + | Zierhofer, W. (2002). Speech acts and space(s): Language pragmatics and the discursive constitution of the social. ''Environment and Planning, 34'', 1355-1372. Retrieved on 10 October 2010, from http://blackboard.ru.nl/bbcswebdav/courses/ABBW-BCU255A-01-2010/Zierhofer(2002).pdf |
| - | Zierhofer, W. (2005). State, power and space. Social Geography,1,29-36. Retrieved on 10 October 2010, from http://www.soc-geogr.net/1/29/2005/sg-1-29-2005.pdf, p.32 | + | Zierhofer, W. (2005). State, power and space. ''Social Geography, 1'', 29-36. Retrieved on 10 October 2010, from http://www.soc-geogr.net/1/29/2005/sg-1-29-2005.pdf, p.32 |
| Line 27: | Line 25: | ||
Eddited by Robbert Wilmink--[[User:RobbertWilmink|RobbertWilmink]] 20:54, 12 October 2011 (CEST) | Eddited by Robbert Wilmink--[[User:RobbertWilmink|RobbertWilmink]] 20:54, 12 October 2011 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Links added and page edited by Aafke Brus'' --[[User:AafkeBrus|AafkeBrus]] 10:27, 1 November 2011 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 09:27, 1 November 2011
First order space is 'created' by Zierhofer. He made a distinction in space, he devided space in 'first order space' and 'second order space'. Zierhofer describes the differences between first and secord order space as follows: "The benefit of this distinction between first and second order spaces is to combine a notion of space as fundamental epistemic category, on the one hand, with the infinite empirical richness of particular object-spaces and locational schemes, on the other hand" (Zierhofer, 2005, p. 32). When we add time to space, we enter the second order space.
Important is "to realize that the function and value of a universal epistemic category rests in the possibility to be applied to contents of any kind, but that this does not imply a claim of universal validity. Only an interpretation of first order space as a contingent cognitive tool – a distinction produced and used in a certain communicative context – would be compatible with a non-representational approach" (Zierhofer, 2005, p. 32).
The first order space as Zierhofer says it: "is nothing but the bare possibility to draw one or more distinctions." (2002, p. 1369) To make these distinctions we need to have underlying terms or codes to make sure we can make this distinction. For example: here/there, Yes/No and we need an amount of units to make it possible to rank these units.
See also:
References:
Zierhofer, W. (2002). Speech acts and space(s): Language pragmatics and the discursive constitution of the social. Environment and Planning, 34, 1355-1372. Retrieved on 10 October 2010, from http://blackboard.ru.nl/bbcswebdav/courses/ABBW-BCU255A-01-2010/Zierhofer(2002).pdf
Zierhofer, W. (2005). State, power and space. Social Geography, 1, 29-36. Retrieved on 10 October 2010, from http://www.soc-geogr.net/1/29/2005/sg-1-29-2005.pdf, p.32
Contributors:
Published by: ?
Eddited by Robbert Wilmink--RobbertWilmink 20:54, 12 October 2011 (CEST)
Links added and page edited by Aafke Brus --AafkeBrus 10:27, 1 November 2011 (CET)
